Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

World24x7hr

@world24x7hr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

29,799subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002432266986
TypeChannel
Username@world24x7hr
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/world24x7hr

Growth

29,79029,82129,805.57 August 2026 — 29,790 subscribers8 August 2026 — 29,816 subscribers9 August 2026 — 29,812 subscribers10 August 2026 — 29,821 subscribers11 August 2026 — 29,820 subscribers12 August 2026 — 29,818 subscribers13 August 2026 — 29,819 subscribers15 August 2026 — 29,799 subscribers29,7997 August 202615 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 8 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,785–29,826 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 04:0529,799-20
13 Aug 2026, 23:3429,819+1
12 Aug 2026, 15:2529,818-2
11 Aug 2026, 17:3429,820-1
10 Aug 2026, 19:1329,821+9
9 Aug 2026, 16:0629,812-4
8 Aug 2026, 15:0129,816+26
7 Aug 2026, 15:4529,790first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.4%
avg views ÷ 29,799 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,090
45 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
45
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 44 of 45 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held45 (6 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total139,244
Reactions total1,529
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 02:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
24m 02s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 33 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,529 reactions across 44 posts, in 48 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23115.1%
🤬18312.0%
🕊1258.18%
👏1016.61%
🌚905.89%
😢905.89%
😱664.32%
🤡664.32%
🙏583.79%
🔥513.34%
😡432.81%
💩422.75%
🤣422.75%
🫡382.49%
👍291.90%
🐳271.77%
🤮211.37%
👎201.31%
💔201.31%
🤯181.18%
28 further kinds16811.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,529reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 45 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @world24x7hr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 45 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 23:16 UTC638 views5 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👀21🔥1🙏1

14 Aug 2026, 23:00 UTC666 views13 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🇮🇩: Powerful earthquake felt in Flores region, Indonesia, preliminary magnitude at 7.4-7.6 Subscribe | @World24x7hr

😱6🙏6🔥1

14 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC≈1,230 views74 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @wildlifecctvVideo

🇺🇸: La Jolla Teen Pleads Guilty to Kicking Sea Lion Tyler Muehl, 18, of affluent La Jolla, pleaded guilty Aug. 13, 2026, to a Marine Mammal Protection Act misdemeanor for kicking and chasing a sea lion on July 22 at La Jolla Cove. He faces up to 1 year in prison and a $100,000 fine; sentencing is set for Oct. 20. NOAA called the intentional striking illegal and dangerous to the animal. Subscribe | @Wildcctv

🤬56🤡12👍5👏1

14 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC≈1,490 views42 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸: “I shot Mr. Thompson in Manhattan and he died.”: Luigi Mangione Pleads Guilty to Shooting UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson Luigi Mangione pleaded guilty on August 14, 2026, in Manhattan federal court to stalking charges resulting in the death of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. In court he admitted traveling to New York with the intent to shoot the executive and stated, “I shot Mr. Thompson in Manhattan

🫡266💔6🤔2🔥1😨1

14 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC≈1,640 views21 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿: Greater Anglia train derails near Wickford, Essex — second southern England rail incident in 24 hours. Subscribe | @World24x7hr

🤡145👀2

13 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC≈2,500 views15 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🇺🇸: Oakland Police Fatally Shoot Man Wielding Makeshift Spears Near Homeless Encampment; Bodycam Footage Released Jose Angel Castillo, 43, was shot and killed by Oakland police on July 13, 2026, near a homeless encampment after refusing to drop makeshift spears. Officers used Tasers; he then swung a spear at them, prompting two officers to fire. He died at the scene. Newly released bodycam footage shows the inciden

👎6🔥5🥴21💩1

13 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC≈2,530 views21 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🇮🇹: An explosion hit the KNDS Ammo Italy munitions plant in Colleferro, near Rome, on Thursday afternoon after a fire in the powder-pressing area. No injuries were reported among the limited staff present; the blast was heard for kilometers and produced a large smoke plume. Subscribe | @World24x7hr

9🎉7🔥5

13 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC≈2,580 views34 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸↗️: S&P 500 hits 7,800 for the first time in history. Subscribe | @World24x7hr

💩17👏6🥴5🆒3🤷‍♂2💅1

12 Aug 2026, 21:59 UTC≈2,970 views28 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🇮🇩: Honda Jazz Crashes into Spectators During Drag Race in Kotamobagu, Killing 8 On August 9, 2026, in Kotamobagu, North Sulawesi, a Honda Jazz driven by Tian Ngantung lost control after the finish line during a drag race and crashed into spectators, killing eight and injuring nine. Subscribe | @World24x7hr

😱14🕊84😁1😡1

12 Aug 2026, 21:43 UTC≈3,270 views30 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🇪🇸: Spain Sees First Total Solar Eclipse in Over a Century Subscribe | @World24x7hr

🔥214🤡4🌚1

12 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC≈2,800 views19 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🇹🇷: A Turkish Air Force F-16 fighter jet crashed on August 12, 2026, during a training flight in the northwestern province of Yalova. Turkey’s Ministry of National Defence confirmed that the pilot ejected safely and survived the incident; the pilot was taken to hospital as a precaution and reported to be in good condition. Subscribe | @World24x7hr

🔥134🤩1🥱1

12 Aug 2026, 20:56 UTC≈2,690 views12 reactionsread 15 August 2026

🇺🇸: On August 12, 2026, in Hopkins, Minnesota (a Minneapolis suburb), a man killed his partner and their child in an apparent murder-suicide at the in-home daycare they owned and operated, known as Brown Bear Childcare. Police responded around 9 a.m. to a report of a stabbing after a parent dropping off a child witnessed the attack unfolding; officers found the man, woman, and child dead inside the home. The six ot

🥴4🙏3😱2💔1🤣1😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @world24x7hr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 22:07 UTCAnonymous Poll415 voters

The content is good so far?

  1. Yes69%
  2. No17%
  3. Add more geopolitics23%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 516,864 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“World24x7hr” (@world24x7hr), 29,799 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/world24x7hr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.