Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Жилов Алексей | Главный по кадрам

@workersrussian

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

187subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001962017677
TypeChannel
Username@workersrussian
DescriptionВладелец аутсорсинговой-кадровой компании. С вопросами по линейному персоналу в личку
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/workersrussian

Growth

1877 Aug 2026, 14:21 — 187 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 12:05 — 187 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 14:218 Aug 2026, 12:05
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 186–188 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 12:05187no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:21187first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 19 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
63.4%
avg views ÷ 187 subscribers
Avg views / post
119
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 July 2026
Posts held16 (19 April 202516 July 2026)
Views total237
Reactions total21
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
55
Videos
9
Links
12

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

276 reactions across 14 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍8029.0%
🔥7828.3%
4817.4%
💯145.07%
🎉113.99%
🏆103.62%
😱93.26%
👌51.81%
🤔41.45%
🤝31.09%
🎄20.725%
🎅20.725%
👏20.725%
😁20.725%
10.362%
10.362%
🆒10.362%
👎10.362%
😎10.362%
🤬10.362%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 276reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2025 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 16 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @workersrussian. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 April 2025 to 16 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2026, 07:56 UTC118 views14 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026

Именно по таким же критериям мы и выбираем наших бригадиром, полностью соглашусь с подходом Эфко и мыслями Сергея Николаевича Иванова. Главные качества для бригадиров- умение найти общий язык с каждым в бригаде, а также разбираться в типах людей, уметь найти рычаг в различных ситуациях, сплотить и развить коллектив.

👍10🤝2🎉1💯1

16 Jul 2026, 07:52 UTC119 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @sergei_ivanov_efko

Почему лучший в профессии – это худший бригадир? Почти половина из ответивших выбрали лучшего в профессии. Первые лет 10 директорского опыта, у меня ни один мускул бы не дернулся против этого решения. Логично. Справедливо. Объяснимо. НО! Какими личными качествами обладает лучший слесарь по ремонту оборудования? Наверняка бескомпромиссность. Еще точность и однозначность суждений. Плюс требовательность к себе и пред

👍411💯1

8 Apr 2026, 12:37 UTC269 viewsread 8 August 2026

Встреча получилась очень насыщенной и действительно появилось понимание куда идёт рынок- тренды на минимализацию рисков, плавная перестройка моделей работы на другие лыжи и , самое главное, ПЛОТНАЯ и долгая работа с заказчиками, доносить позицию рынка, что как раньше больше не будет. Есть новая реальность и в ней мы все скоро будем.

8 Apr 2026, 12:37 UTC312 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @reshanov

Вчера в Москве провели закрытую встречу лидеров рынка аутсорсинга и аутстаффинга. По нашей оценке — около 10% всего рынка. В одном помещении собрали владельцев и управляющих партнеров ряда крупнейших компаний. Фамилии и названия компаний сознательно не раскрываем. — Совокупная выход участников — более 100 000 человек ежедневно. — Совокупная выручка — свыше 100 млрд рублей в год. Это уже достаточная выборка, чтобы

👍83🤝1

3 Feb 2026, 08:48 UTC464 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Это извечная классика конечно же) но шутки шутками, а в условиях оптимизаций и текущей обстановки в экономике, многие сильные специалисты не могут , как еще полтора года назад, быстро найти хорошую работу.

🔥5😁21🤬1

31 Dec 2025, 19:43 UTC626 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

13🎉10👍7🎄2🎅2

11 Dec 2025, 19:33 UTC447 viewsread 8 August 2026

Записывайтесь на эфир, будем рассказывать много полезного и отвечать на вопросы

11 Dec 2025, 19:33 UTC660 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @undergog_bizPhoto

Хотите реальных историй от людей, которые строили бизнес самостоятельно, набивали ошибки и достигали высот? 18 декабря в 16:30 (МСК) — специальный закрытый эфир, куда мы позвали тех, кто точно знает как строить бизнес по аутсорсингу. 📛 В прямом эфире с Денисом Решановым: 🎙 Петр Клеванный Никогда не работал в найме. Построил успешный аутсорсинговый бизнес в Калининграде с нуля. 🎙 Алексей Жилов Выводит 1000+ челове

👍12🔥611🏆1

18 Nov 2025, 12:43 UTC546 views15 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @outsourcing_evoPhoto

Нетворкинг во всю на протяжении всей конференции 🤩🤩🤩

🔥103👍2

18 Nov 2025, 12:43 UTC426 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Всем привет! Давно ничего не писал в канале, но новостей ОЧЕНЬ много. Грядут большие перемены в аутсорсинговой и кадровых сферах. Ужесточение контроля со стороны ФНС, демпинг маленьких «черных» компаний на рынке прекращается(напишу отдельный пост почему, если коротко - большие риски для заказчиков). Меняется подход к работе, оценка рисков, крупные и средние игроки уже понимают это и отказываются предоставлять стабиль

🔥14🏆3💯3

5 Aug 2025, 16:04 UTC673 views32 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Расширяем географию работ- наша сотрудница передает пламенный привет с тепличного комбината на Урале. Сегодня запустили новую площадку. Всегда готовы к работе в ЛЮБОЙ точке нашей необъятной Родины!

👍16🔥9👌52

25 Jul 2025, 20:30 UTC684 views26 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @reshanovPhoto

А вечером встреча к коллегами по ассоциации. Не скажу, что мы не говорили об аутсорсинге. Конечно, говорили. Но не много. Быстро переключились на более веселые темы😅 Всегда рад видеть единомышленников! Искренне радуюсь таким встречам

🔥146👍5😎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @workersrussian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Жилов Алексей | Главный по кадрам” (@workersrussian), 187 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/workersrussian.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.