Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Strike!

@worker_militant

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

61subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001687089930
TypeChannel
Username@worker_militant
DescriptionКанал о рабочем движении, деятельности марксистских организаций и борьбе с капитализмом в различных странах мира. Пролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!
Created8 June 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/worker_militant

Growth

617 August 2026 — 61 subscribers10 August 2026 — 61 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 60–62 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 04:3161no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:0361first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 November 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
55
Videos
3
Links
9

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

90 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3538.9%
😁1516.7%
910.0%
🤔910.0%
🔥88.89%
😱77.78%
😢66.67%
🤬11.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 November 2023 to 22 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Mar 2024, 21:36 UTC125 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Это не ужасный конец, а ужас без конца. Соболезнования родственникам погибших!

3👍1

10 Feb 2024, 18:47 UTC208 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Прогноз автора на предстоящие выборы президента: Путин - 83% Даванков - 7% Слуцкий и Харитонов - по 5% Сверим с результатами!

🤔8😁1

1 Feb 2024, 03:19 UTC248 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Как вы думаете, набрал бы Надеждин 10% рейтинга, если от КПРФ шёл, допустим, Левченко? Разумеется, нет. Но руководство КПРФ упорно делает всё, чтобы даже такой серый и невзрачный либерал, каким является Надеждин, обогнал их. Возможно, в руководстве Компартии затаились латентные либералы, оранжевая проказа, как говорит Зюганов😂

😁4😢1

17 Jan 2024, 15:06 UTC230 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

☝️Кстати, тот факт, что нацистскими падонками был украден пакет с курочкой из КФС даёт право квалифицировать это преступление не просто как хулиганство, а как разбой, совершённый группой лиц. А это особо тяжкое преступление, до 15 лет лишения свободы. Потому, надеюсь, после огласки ситуации рыбинские правоохранители займутся ситуацией.

👍2

17 Jan 2024, 14:51 UTC248 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Об усилении уличных фашистов и о том, как с этим бороться Недавно было совершено нападение на активиста КПРФ из Рыбинска (Ярославская область) со стороны фашиствующих элементов. Естественно, эти "герои" избили безоружного человека и двух его аполитичных друзей толпой, выкрикивая экстремистские лозунги. В результате, был украден ещё и пакет с едой из КФС. Очевидно, что данные элементы в связях с местными властными ст

😱7

12 Jan 2024, 12:20 UTC185 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Суть выдвинутых обвинений против Удальцова можно описать одной фразой: "Был бы человек - а статья всегда найдётся".

👍4

11 Jan 2024, 10:51 UTC459 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

По поводу задержания Сергея Удальцова. Во-первых, недопустимо злорадствования над товарищем, пусть и не совсем ваших взглядов. Поведение некоторых внесистемных левых блогеров тут омерзительно, особенно если учесть, что сами они сейчас не в тюремной камере, а в одной из теплых постсоветских стран. Конечно, можно и нужно критиковать, но не так! Во-вторых, причиной является явно не комментарий в тг-канале Удальцова. Э

👍6🤔1

29 Dec 2023, 18:08 UTC249 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Для сравнения, какой-то ноунейм, набравший на выборах 11% и смевший критиковать В. Путина, чего честный коммунист себе не позволит.

🔥5

29 Dec 2023, 18:05 UTC257 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Просто потрясающая медийная узнаваемость! Второй тур точно обеспечен!

😁8

25 Dec 2023, 20:37 UTC237 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Отвечу на вопрос некоторых товарищей из КПРФ, который заключается в том, что РРП сама не предлагала никаких кандидатов КПРФ на выборах. Мы считаем, что кандидата должны определять низовые партийцы компартии, которые в основном выходцы из наёмных работников, а также сторонники КПРФ. Ведь задача кандидата на выборах - как можно шире донести программу социалистических преобразований и мобилизовать вокруг себя рабочий кл

👍7

22 Dec 2023, 12:50 UTC279 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Выскажу несколько мыслей насчёт выдвижения Харитонова в президенты. 1) На самом деле, если бы КПРФ долгое время информационно раскручивала Харитонова, то может быть его выдвижение члены КПРФ и союзники Компартии встретили не так негативно. Однако мы не видим ни одного интервью Харитонова, ни одного громкого выступления в Госдуме или законотворческой инициативы, более того, у кандидата в Президенты нет даже собственн

👍4🤬1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @worker_militant. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Dec 2023, 12:23 UTCAnonymous Poll50 voters

А вы довольны выдвижением Николая Харитонова в президенты от КПРФ?

  1. Да14%
  2. Нет40%
  3. Кто это вообще?46%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Nov 2023, 11:22 UTCAnonymous Poll34 voters

Кто будет кандидатом от КПРФ на выборах президента?

  1. Г. А. Зюганов29%
  2. Другой кандидат71%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 November 2023 to 22 March 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Strike!” (@worker_militant), 61 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/worker_militant.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.