Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ТРУДО-ВЫЕБУДНИ РП

@workadaylife

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

101subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002753308172
TypeChannel
Username@workadaylife
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 2 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/workadaylife

Growth

10110 Aug 2026, 03:46 — 101 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 05:11 — 101 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 03:4610 Aug 2026, 05:11
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 100–102 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 05:11101no change
10 Aug 2026, 03:46101first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 2 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

224 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8537.9%
👍7031.3%
2611.6%
👏146.25%
😁125.36%
🤯62.68%
🤓52.23%
😐20.893%
🙈20.893%
🤔10.446%
🤨10.446%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 224reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2025 to 18 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 18 we hold a reading for · 78%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @workadaylife. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 September 2025 to 18 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Jun 2026, 16:15 UTC85 views11 reactions2 Starsread 10 August 2026
File

ДГП Москвы представил чек-лист оценки архитектурного решения. И, на мой взгляд, это ещё один сигнал того, что архитектура постепенно превращается из творческого процесса в регламентируемую процедуру. Если раньше архитектурный облик во многом оценивался профессиональным мнением Архсовета, то теперь появляется перечень конкретных критериев, по которым проект можно проверить. Среди них: • наличие нескольких вариантов а

🔥7👍4

7 Apr 2026, 10:02 UTC123 views13 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Photo

«Зелёный» ГОСТ. Теперь не маркетинг, а система требований Принят новый межгосударственный стандарт ГОСТ 35329–2026 по «зелёному» жилью. По сути - это не просто экология. Это попытка задать единые правила качества жилья на всём жизненном цикле: от проекта до эксплуатации. Вступает в силу с 1 июля 2026. Стандарт собирает в одну систему всё, что раньше было разрозненно: • энергоэффективность (не ниже класса А)

👍8🔥2🤯2🤓1

25 Feb 2026, 11:07 UTC151 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Админ в отпуске. А профессиональная деформация-нет. Подпись для фото: Когда Пхукетский комитет по архитектуре всё таки не доглядел… Ну, или осознанно закрыл глаза.

🔥5👍4😁1

21 Feb 2026, 09:00 UTC123 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Моему преподавателю, коллеге, высококлассному профессионалу и просто хорошему другу удалось отыскать официальный текст вводимого с 01.03.2026 ГОСТ на отделочные работы. Проходим по ссылке! изучаем, готовимся к новым поворотам))😁🙄 👇👇👇

🔥61👍1

21 Feb 2026, 09:00 UTC147 views9 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @sestroioPhoto

❗️1 марта 2026г. вступает в силу ГОСТ Р 72509-2026 «Отделочные работы. Требования к результатам работ». В стандарте установлены требования к результатам работ для различных классов отделки помещений. Для каждого класса отделки помещений установлены значения предельных отклонений от плоскостности, прямолинейности, вертикальности, горизонтальности, соответствия отделочных работ помещений требованиям к результатам рабо

5🔥3👍1

20 Feb 2026, 10:10 UTC136 views9 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Photo

Классификация жилья vs новый ГОСТ на отделку. Два мира, которые пока не сошлись На рынке давно существует Единая методика классификации жилых новостроек по качеству проекта. Она определяет класс дома "стандарт", "комфорт", "бизнес", "элит" через совокупность характеристик: архитектуру, планировки, инженерку, инфраструктуру, уровень отделки и применяемые материалы. По сути-это модель качества жилья как продукта. Но

🔥4👍3🤓2

19 Feb 2026, 10:50 UTC101 views15 reactions2 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ГОСТ на отделку. Документ есть. Текста нет. С 1 марта 2026 вводится ГОСТ Р 72509-2026 «Отделочные работы. Требования к результатам работ». Стандарт утверждён, внесён в каталог… но сам текст до сих пор не опубликован. Работать по нему скоро придётся, не имея документа на руках. Что вводится Появляется система классов отделки (для жилья — 1–6): 1 класс - почти идеал 6 класс - «жить можно» (но это не точно) Для каж

🔥102👍2👏1

18 Feb 2026, 11:43 UTC83 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Профессиональная деформация. Смотрю на весы и думаю: А свидетельство о поверке имеется? Или работаем по факту? Т.е. как обычно🤪😁

😁7👍2🔥2

18 Feb 2026, 06:56 UTC108 views14 reactions2 Starsread 10 August 2026
File

IFC-АГР. Теперь проект отклоняет не человек, а система. Как и обещал сегодня публикую презентационные материалы семинара. IFC нам подавали как «просто формат», на замену обводкам поэтажных планировок. По факту-это новый цифровой фильтр, который ломает привычный процесс согласований. И да, проблем будет больше, чем кажется. Поэтому, для команд, планирующих подачу в апреле–мае, под руководством инициаторов требовани

👍7🔥3👏21🤔1

17 Feb 2026, 14:45 UTC335 views15 reactions2 Starsread 10 August 2026

АГР нового поколения. IFC-модель. Сегодня в ДГП состоялся семинар по модели IFC. Как/что/где? Презентация на фото будет в следующем посту (ее обещают и выложить официально), а пока краткое изложение и видение вводимых требований! Распоряжением ДГП от 16.01.2026 года были утверждены новые требования к материалам для согласования АГР. Вступают в силу с 02.04.2026 года. Требования «старые» к НПМ и ВПМ пока продолжаю

🔥5👍4👏3🤯21

13 Feb 2026, 10:54 UTC108 views11 reactions2 Starsread 10 August 2026

И если по всем каналам новость про выход Постановление ПМО от 30.12.2025 №1865-ПП уже прогремела с выводом : "это - убивает проекты", то подробного разбора изменения в Положение о порядке рассмотрения заявлений о заключении договора о КРТ по инициативе правообладателей...." как-то не встречалось... поэтому пост! Первый лист изменений - и все схватились за сердечко💔. Постановление вносит Раздел XXIV - обязательный пл

🔥5👍4🤯2

13 Feb 2026, 05:06 UTC91 views14 reactions2 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Как насчёт прикинуть снеговую нагрузку? ❄️🙄 Объект испытаний - автомобиль 😁

👍6😁4🤓2🙈2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @workadaylife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 884,239 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ТРУДО-ВЫЕБУДНИ РП” (@workadaylife), 101 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/workadaylife.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.