Channel
@wonlyu9496
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
716subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002876467093 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wonlyu9496 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wonlyu9496 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 716 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 716 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,400 |
| Reactions total | 59 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
59 reactions across 16 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 52 | 88.1% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 6.78% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 5.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🍕트랜치(Tranche)란? 프랑스 용어로 '토막, 조각'. 금융시장에서 트램치 구조는 "하나의 거대한 채권을 투자자들의 입맛에 맙게 여러 조각으로 쪼개서 파는 것" 알파벳이 250억 달러라는 돈을 빌리면서 "10개 만기 트랜치 구조"를 썼다는건, 거대한 차용증을 만기와 이자 지급 방식을 서로 다른 10개의 조각으로 나눠서 발행했다는 것. =>금액이 너무 크거나 만기가 맞지 않아 집갑을 닫는것을 방지 (선책지를 넓혀주는 것) 단기조각 - 2년, 3년 중기 - 5년, 7년 장기 - 10년, 20년 30년, 40년 구글이 귀찮게 10 트랜치로 쪼갠 이유 • "우리 30년짜리 채권 하나로만 250억 빌려줘"하면 2-3년 단기 투자만 하는 은행은 참여 안하지. • 단기는 이자가 비교적 낮고, 장기는 길가보니 전체적인 이자비용을 저렴하게 낮춰
❤3
알파벳, 초대형 회사채 발행에 1,150억 달러 매수 주문 유입 구글은 원래 현금이 많은 '기업'. 그런 구글이 무려 250억 달러라는 거액의 채권을 발행해 돈을 빌린다고 함. 그런데 실제로 "나도 살래" 한 금액이 모두 합치니 1,150억 달러. 구글이 원한 것보다 4.6배나 많은 청약 자금 => 그렇다고 그 돈을 다 받는건 아니고, 골라서 250억달러만 판매 => 그렇게되면 이자 가장 싸게 빌리려는 합의 가능! **채권 발행이란? —————- 기업이나 국가가 수많은 투자자들에게 돈을 빌렸다는 증서를 써주고 큰돈을 빌리는 것. 은행에서 대풀을 받는것과 비슷. 하지만 '누구에게'빌리는가가 가장 큰 차이 은행: 하나의 은행에 가서 " 돈 빌려주세요"하고 대출 계약을 맺어 채권: 시장에 나가서 여러, 개인, 기관, 외국인 등에게 "내가…
❤1
그러면 다음주 월요일부터 7:30 라이브 탕탕 시작하겠습니다 🙂
❤1
모닝 라이브시간대 (15-20분)
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
출근정 미장 시황 브리핑 7:30AM 시작하겠습니다 ! 시간은 약 20분 안쪽으로 https://t.me/wonlyu9496?livestream=3d218775d60eb76ece
❤7
리사 쿡 연준 이사 추가 금리 인상 가능성 시사 보통 쿡 이사는 시장 친화적인 발언을 많이 해온 편이었는데, 이번엔 완전히 매운맛으로 돌아왔습니다. 알래스카 연설에서 "물가가 너무 높다, 필요하면 금리 더 올릴 준비 되어 있다"고 아주 센 발언을 던졌거든요. 연준이 제일 중요하게 보는 게 '물가 잡기'랑 '일자리 지키기' 두 가지잖아요? 그런데 쿡 이사는 지금 일자리 걱정할 때가 아니고 물가 터지는 걸 막는 게 훨씬 급하다고 본 겁니다. 시장에선 이제 금리 내려주겠지 하고 기대하고 있었는데, 도리어 금리를 더 올릴 수도 있다는 이야기가 나오니까 많이 당황스러운 분위기입니다. 당분간 증시 변동성에 유의하셔야겠습니다! 작성자: 원앵커의 월가 비밀노트 https://t.me/wonlyu9496/628
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3
0806 미증시 특징주 😎아래 줄글 특징주 정리 https://blog.naver.com/jpamdabest/224369554429 엔비디아 (NVDA) 이슈: 일론 머스크 CEO, "스페이스X AI 컴퓨팅 인프라에 엔비디아 프로세서만 독점 사용" 발표. 실적 콘퍼런스 콜에서 "세계 최고 AI 컴퓨터 보유" 극찬. 영향: 독점 공급 지위 재확인으로 AI 칩 시장 내 지배력 강화. 투자심리 개선으로 주가 상승 견인. AMD (AMD) 이슈: 머스크의 엔비디아 독점 발언으로 입지 확대 기대감 위축. 2분기 실적(매출·EPS)은 예상치를 웃돌았으나, 시장 눈높이에 못 미치는 3분기 매출 전망(130억 달러) 및 투자 금액 부담 가중. 영향: 강력한 경쟁사(엔비디아)의 독점 계약 소식과 미래 가이던스 실망감이 겹치며 주가 하방 압력 지속. …
❤4
도움이 된다 하시면 ❤️ 안된다 영상 유튜브 방송이 낫다 하시면 👏
❤20👏3
Live stream finished (19 minutes)
SPACE X / 스페이스X: 실적 선방에도 주가는 왜 숨고르기 들어갔을까? https://blog.naver.com/jpamdabest/224368470752
어닝 서프라이즈에도 숨고르기 들어간 AMD 주가, 지금이 매수 타이밍일까? https://blog.naver.com/jpamdabest/224368468925
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wonlyu9496. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
모닝 라이브시간대 (15-20분)
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 326,051 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“원앵커의 월가 비밀노트 ➖미국증시” (@wonlyu9496), 716 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wonlyu9496.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.