Channel
@wondersAround
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
288subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001700003726 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wondersAround |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wondersAround |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 288 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:19 | 287 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 287 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
30 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 6 | 20.0% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 16.7% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 16.7% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 13.3% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 13.3% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 3.33% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 3.33% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 3.33% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 3.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Что важнее: изобретение пенициллина, открытие днк или теория относительности?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Вот так вот лучше😅😅 Ну а теперь - прикольный опрос: 🤔✨ Друзья, как вы думаете, какое из этих двух открытий важнее для выживания человечества прямо сейчас — медицинский пенициллин, 💊 , генная инженерия ДНК или физическая теория относительности 🌌? Что спасает нас больше — биология, медицина или технологии? Давайте поспорим! 👇💬 Просьба - проголосовать внизу ☺️
Photo, posted without a caption
Ой, сорри. Не та фотография 😅😅
Photo, posted without a caption
• Ну и ...? Зачем это нужно? Скукота - скажет кто то...🥱 А вот и нет! Каждый раз, когда вы заказываете такси или строите маршрут на карте, вы пользуетесь открытием Эйнштейна. Спутники GPS и ГЛОНАСС двигаются с огромной скоростью на высоте тысяч километров над Землей. Из-за этого время там течет иначе, чем на планете. Если бы инженеры не учитывали формулу Эйнштейна, навигатор ошибался бы на несколько километров в ден…
👍1🔥1
🌌 3. Космос, время и... ваш смартфон: Теория относительности (Премия по физике, 1921 год — Альберт Эйнштейн) Это открытие полностью перевернуло наше представление о Вселенной. Эйнштейн доказал, что пространство и время — это не застывшие декорации, они могут растягиваться и сжиматься под воздействием гравитации! 🌀⏳
🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
🧫 2. Спасение миллиардов: Открытие антибиотиков (Премия по физиологии или медицине, 1945 год — Александр Флеминг, Эрнст Борис Чейн и Говард Уолтер Флори) Представьте мир, где обычная царапина на ровном месте или простуда могли стать смертным приговором 😱. До середины XX века так и было! Всё изменилось благодаря одной... забывчивости. Александр Флеминг уехал в отпуск, оставив немытыми лабораторные чашки, а вернувшис…
🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
Однако, давайте сегодня я вам расскажу хотя бы про 3⃣ самих крутых открытия🔥, оказавших колоссальное влияние на разные аспекты нашей с вами жизни: 1. Открытие структуры ДНК 🧬(1962 год, Джеймс Уотсон, Фрэнсис Крик и Морис Уилкинс): Это открытие фундаментально изменило биологию и медицину.🔬 Понимание двойной спирали ДНК позволило расшифровать генетический код, разработать методы генной инженерии, диагностики и лече…
🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wondersAround. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что важнее: изобретение пенициллина, открытие днк или теория относительности?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 14 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,335,595 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Все простое - гениально” (@wondersAround), 288 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wondersAround.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.