Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

rewrite the stars

@won1estars

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

50subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001824707271
TypeChannel
Username@won1estars
Descriptionтак почему бы нам не переписать судьбу? мы заставим мир принадлежать нам. anon. @won1estars_bot
Created8 January 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/won1estars

Growth

507 August 2026 — 50 subscribers10 August 2026 — 50 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49–51 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 11:4650no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:0350first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 27 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
304
Videos
70
Links
12

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

167 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12574.9%
💔3018.0%
custom 5266988677929650456127.19%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2024 to 10 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Jul 2024, 14:57 UTC≈2,660 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

может кто еще не перешел переходите 🌟

5

3 Jul 2024, 09:58 UTC≈2,650 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

всем привет дорогие друзья пришла сообщить важную новость ! как вы могли заметить я вообще была неактивна здесь много думала о том что делать вообще мысли доходили до закрытия но я поняла что не смогу без места где смогу кричать о любви к чонвону так что 😞 я переезжаю на новый канал потому что этот уже как-то не заходит мои качели здесь меня раздражают поэтому наилучшим решением будет начать все с чистого листа 🌟 @ll

11💔1

1 Jul 2024, 19:56 UTC≈1,860 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026

как у вас дела вообще ? я опять пропадаю впрочем как и всегда просто пытаюсь все еще оклематься от поездки и разгрузить свой мозг а еще голова болит соу :(

5💔5

30 Jun 2024, 15:02 UTC≈1,690 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026

песня, над которой работал чонвон, называется hundred broken hearts ! 💔

8💔2

30 Jun 2024, 15:01 UTC≈1,650 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

КАКАЯ КРАСОТА НАЗВАНИЯ ТРЕКОВ ПРОСТО ВАУ ? ?

10💔2

30 Jun 2024, 13:17 UTC≈1,480 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ААА САМЫЙ ХОРОШИЙ ! ! 💔💔

8💔2

29 Jun 2024, 13:56 UTC≈1,290 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026

вам тоже кажется что чонвонеркам очень тяжело в последнее время.

10

29 Jun 2024, 13:55 UTC≈1,220 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

спа?????сибо?????(:)/)/&@29/7.&)282)/8/)@/!/8

12💔2custom 52669886779296504562

27 Jun 2024, 23:04 UTC≈1,050 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

у меня стадия отрицания а у вас

7💔4custom 52669886779296504561

27 Jun 2024, 23:00 UTC≈1,170 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

кроп топ без рукавов джинсы с ремнем _такая_ укладка очки браслеты пирсинги в ушах темный макияж с акцентом на брови . . это нелегально по моему я не знаю уже как мне жить ❓❓❓

13💔6custom 52669886779296504564

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @won1estars. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 719,654 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“rewrite the stars” (@won1estars), 50 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/won1estars.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.