Channel
@woman_psyhology
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,847subscribers
-93 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001288099274 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @woman_psyhology |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 20 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/woman_psyhology |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 5,847 | -21 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 14:37 | 5,868 | -14 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 5,882 | -14 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:19 | 5,896 | -14 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 5,910 | -10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 5,920 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 5,922 | -17 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 5,939 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 5,940 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
51 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 39 | 76.5% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 17.6% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 3.92% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.96% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VSb5ycyWEE | 1 | 15 June 2026 | 15 June 2026 |
| 2Vtzqx6nVKh | 1 | 17 August 2026 | 17 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 18 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
💌 Практика «Мои сильные качества» — Иногда мы забываем, что у нас уже есть кучу крутых навыков и черт. ⏺️Возьми блокнот или лист бумаги. ⏺️Напиши 5 качеств, за которые ты себя ценишь. ⏺️Добавь 3 достижения, которыми гордишься, даже маленькие. ⏺️Подумай, как эти качества помогают тебе в жизни. ⏺️Повесь список там, где будешь видеть каждый день. С каждым днём ты будешь замечать свои сильные стороны всё больше и стано…
Опять не тот человек. Опять всё на вас. Опять вы терпите, объясняете, надеетесь — и в какой-то момент думаете: «Почему я снова в этих отношениях?» Это может быть не случайность, а сценарий. В канале «Про Метод» в закрепе пошаговая инструкция по выходу из сложных сценариев отношений. Жмите на ссылку и переходите в канал Реклама. ИП Теребенин Евгений Валентинович erid: 2Vtzqx6nVKh
Чтобы не коверкать себе реальность, а, напротив, превратить ее в чудесный и приятный во всех отношениях мир, вам потребуется ввести в обиход один простой принцип: во всем находить пользу. Буквально извлекать пользу из любой досадной ситуации, вообще из любого события, вызывающего хоть малейшее ваше неприятие. Поставьте себе такую цель — вытаскивать пользу. 💕 Психология женщины
❤4🔥1
Как это мило🥺 Мужчины пишут ответы на вопрос: «какого это любить свою жену?».
❤4
Что выберете?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Поддерживать, а не обвинять Знаете за что я благодарен своей жене? За ее поддержку, когда я могу в чем-то ошибиться. Меня не обвиняют, я не слышу фраз по типу "а я же говорила". И это правда очень ценное качество в отношениях. Когда косячишь, внутри и так паршиво. Последнее, что тебе нужно в этот момент, чтобы близкий человек начинал нравоучения. И главное, чтобы это работало в обе стороны. Тогда вы становитесь на…
❤2
3 признака, что Вы двигаетесь к надёжной привязанности! 1. Вы чаще перестаёте всё принимать на свой счёт. Другой человек может быть раздражён или занят, и вы больше не превращаете это в историю о том, что с вами что-то не так. 2. Вы перестаёте оправдывать плохое поведение. Если раньше верили обещаниям и закрывали глаза, то теперь ясно чувствуете: «Для меня это неприемлемо». 3. Отношения перестают быть полем боя. …
❤2
А смысл отношений, где ты не можешь быть открыт на 100 процентов? 🤔
❤6
Вам кажется, что «что-то не так»… но вы не можете объяснить, что именно? Постоянная тревожность. Раздражение, которое потом сменяется виной. Невозможность расслабиться, даже когда всё «в порядке». Словно вы тянете на себе невидимый груз — день за днём. Вы уже пытались разобраться — с психологом, в книгах, в себе... Но ощущение "тяжести внутри" никуда не исчезает. Если вы: часто злитесь без причины, устаете даже о…
❤1
Любовь — это когда вы понимаете друг друга без слов? 🩷Не всегда. Здорово, конечно, когда вы можете общаться на невербальном уровне в определенных ситуациях. Но когда дело доходит до чувств/желаний — лучше говорить. Партнер же не экстрасенс. Одно дело понять, что вы злитесь/грустите/радуетесь, а другое — понять почему у вас такие эмоции. Поэтому важно соблюдать баланс.🩷
❤4
Если бы он готовил на гостей сам, мыл посуду после них и убирался до и после, то он бы и не был таким гостеприимным😏
💯9💩1
Со временем вы поймёте, что ближе друг друга у вас никого нет. Вместе вы пройдёте через всё: съёмные квартиры и ипотеку, ремонты и переезды, бессонные ночи и счастливые моменты, потери и победы, ссоры и примирения. И однажды, сидя рядом тёплым летним вечером в глубокой старости, поблагодарите друг друга за жизнь, которую прожили вместе…🩷
❤9💩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @woman_psyhology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что выберете?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Психология женщины” (@woman_psyhology), 5,847 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/woman_psyhology.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.