Channel
@wolvesagency
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
372subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002059858272 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wolvesagency |
| Description | telegram ads · meta · strategy · traffic tg 🎯 Ми допомагаємо конвертувати трафік у результати 💬 Безкоштовна консультація @wolwes_agency 📩 Зв’язок із Project Manager: @denys_trafficwolves |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wolvesagency |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:19 | 372 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 372 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
112 reactions across 15 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 44 | 39.3% | |
| 🔥 | 42 | 37.5% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 6.25% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 3.57% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 2.68% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 2.68% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.79% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 1.79% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.893% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.893% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.893% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.893% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.893% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2025 to 16 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
48% користувачів телеграм − це дорослі люди від 18 до 37 років — дані дослідження від Telemetr io x TW 38–54 років ≈30% 38–44 років ≈14% 45–54 років ≈16% Молодь до 18 років становить 10%, а учасники 55+ − близько 13%
❤3👍1
У телеграм зʼявилась функція вказати спадкоємця, який отримає всі ваші канали/подарунки тощо, якщо ви будете не активні протягом 6 місяців @vovkprotg
Яка тема наступного посту була б цікава для тебе?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Підтримайте Олега 💔
❤13
Поки ринок у стагнації, оплати затягуються, а багато проєктів скамляться — Traffic Wolves #1. ▪️Понад 30 клієнтських каналів на контенті у нашого контент-відділу. ▪️7 проєктів у закупі просто зараз, загалом активних — 10. Так, обсяг дещо просів, але ми плануємо збільшити його цього місяця й повернутися до $100 000+ уже в грудні, щоб гарно закрити цей рік 🔥 Наразі жодна команда чи агенція на ринку не має такого дос…
❤2🔥2
Друзі створили дуже крутий аналог трасті, але більш анонімний та універсальніший і прямо в тг Можна створювати віртуальну карту і оплачувати в будь яких країнах світу. Без документів. Також дуже крутий функціонал для адмінів в тг: Чеки з умовами для активації, наприклад, підписка на певні канали або активація лише після того як користувач проголосує за ваш канал (буст) Ну і крута багаторівнева рефералка до 25% За…
❤1🙈1
Стань частиною дослідження Telegram в Україні 2025 Команда аналітичного сервісу Telemetrio разом з TW визначає хто сьогодні є українською аудиторією Telegram. Пройти опитування можна всього за 5 хвилин, а серед усіх учасників, які заповнять анкету та підпишуться на канал організатора, буде розіграно: 📱 iPhone 17 Pro 🎁 100 підписок Telegram Premium 👉 Пройти опитування 👈
❤3
Ситуація: До нас звертається досить відома агенція з оффером на просування FinTech проєкту через телеграм, так як у них не вистачає ресурсів і як виявилось ми вже досить давно співпрацюємо з цим проєктом напряму Всі дороги в телеграм ведуть до TW, і це дуже приємно 😎
❤6👀1😢1
💰Також цікава пропозиція для агенцій або людей які хочуть заробити Ми пропонуємо партнерські відрахування, якщо ви приводите клієнта на послуги просування в Телеграм. Якщо коротко: від вас клієнт — від нас % Зв'язок: @project_trafficwolves
На що орієнтуватись при розвитку телеграм каналу: охоплення чи кількість підписників? Чіткої відповіді нема. Однозначно потрібен "правильний" баланс. Більш якісна аудиторія — більші перегляди (залученість), але і вартість відповідно більша. Більш дешевша аудиторія — низька залученість та більша відписка. На скріншоті яскравий приклад каналу, який заливали на "аби як". Розберемо: 1. Охоплення публікацій до заливу …
Готові взяти в роботу створення каналу під ключ Якщо вам цікава сфера телеграм каналів, ви маєте бажання інвестувати та примножувати свій капітал — це ваш шанс зайти в нішу з надійними партнерами. Ми беремо на себе всі процеси: закуп реклами, контент та продажі реклами. Готова стратегія розвитку, яка допоможе заощадити як час, так і гроші. Зв'язок: @project_trafficwolves
👍5🔥3😁3🤯1😢1
Ми best of the best, не тому що ми так вигадали, а тому що наші проєкти про це свідчать Ділимось публічним списком наших проєктів за останній рік: Канали: Труха⚡️Україна Радник OPG Чесні Новини Україна про Головне Тривога України | Радар Наші Новини України НЕВІДОМИЙ Генерал Звітує | Новини Наглядач🛡 Бізнес/інше: Mood Shop TK-Laser TakeHOT Добробат Харфанг Дідусь Мухомор Оренда Banana DVIZH | CRYPTO Калінчук Анд…
🤝3❤🔥1👏1🔥1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wolvesagency. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Яка тема наступного посту була б цікава для тебе?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2025 to 16 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 586,670 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Traffic Wolves | Digital Agency” (@wolvesagency), 372 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wolvesagency.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.