Now in Russia, Kaliningrad with my Wife
Signed WOLF OF SHIB (NEVER DM FIRST)

Channel
@wolfofshib
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,322subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002443510611 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wolfofshib |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wolfofshib |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 5,322 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 5,324 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 5,327 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 5,328 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 5,331 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 5,334 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 5,335 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 5,342 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:09 | 5,342 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (19 June 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,043 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wolfofshib. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 June 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Now in Russia, Kaliningrad with my Wife
Signed WOLF OF SHIB (NEVER DM FIRST)
I’ll be back soon. Launching only own Projects. I decide to leave ShitCoins. If I see confirmations like PNUT, PENGUIN, PNUT etc. I’ll join and Call here.
Signed WOLF OF SHIB (NEVER DM FIRST)
0xB4610f2f615c4AD9ce3B92821609273062a3cb03 Dev of Kekius Relaunched few hrs old
Signed WOLF OF SHIB (NEVER DM FIRST)
Wow 0x8e62F281f282686fCa6dCB39288069a93fC23F1c Bought some at 6M
Signed WOLF OF SHIB (NEVER DM FIRST)
0x8382342eb994dBc3ee845B8AD3d99C1313AE7b03 Bought at 270k Update: x3 done
Signed WOLF OF SHIB (NEVER DM FIRST)
Mumu The Bull Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 💰 4.25 ETH ($7,958.75) 🪙 5,557,756 MUMU 🏷️ Price: $0.001661 🔼 Mkt Cap: $1,661,136 🔍 0x56c2...8a8b ⬆️ Position: New! Tx | Chart | Web | X | Trending
Signed WOLF OF SHIB (NEVER DM FIRST)
0x8eC17C059f250A5c19566C3fC56EE13A343dD283 Observing. Dev did 500M Project. Update: Bought the Dip at 900k
Signed WOLF OF SHIB (NEVER DM FIRST)
Sold for x2 Looks Like Rug.
Signed WOLF OF SHIB (NEVER DM FIRST)
Bought at 400k Egmh8vWLRrZE5AByuD43KYQjKWkcC4W68bz6jisApump
Signed WOLF OF SHIB (NEVER DM FIRST)
FMqh9mqR6drPZqqW6wPqLHxX4rqNDWGhYLaMfoaJpump
Signed WOLF OF SHIB (NEVER DM FIRST)
Almost x5
Signed WOLF OF SHIB (NEVER DM FIRST)
x2 coming
Signed WOLF OF SHIB (NEVER DM FIRST)
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @wolfofshib. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“$Wolfi's Alpha Channel™️” (@wolfofshib), 5,322 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wolfofshib.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.