Channel
@woahyp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
188subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002212433995 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @woahyp |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/woahyp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 188 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:09 | 188 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 13 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
ой, оказывается, тут такая надпись была, ну ладно пора окончательно тогда точку что ли поставить для всех, кто надеется, что канал оживёт. я больше не стэню и не слушаю ёнпасси (с конца лета получается?) а это значит, что мои шансы вернуться сюда равны нулю. если вы всё-таки настойчивы, то можете здесь остаться и использовать этот канал, как архив с воспоминаниями, но повторюсь. закрытие окончательно! никаких "воз…
тогда это была шутка, но сейчас всё осуществимо 🤩
+ здесь
а я все еще здесь и здесь
всем участвовавшим спасибо. тем, кто не участвовал, надеюсь, вы никогда сюда и не были подписаны.
‼️ // бойкот со стороны русской фанбазы – окончен. :: ещё с самого начала бойкота, я видела, как большому количеству людей просто все равно на девочек. бойкот с самого начала был нацелен на то, чтобы компания хоть немного пришла в себя, ибо там сидят сумасшедшие люди. просто хочу сказать, что я НИКОГДА не забуду то, что творила эта компания и как "тели" с этим так просто соглашались, ссылаясь на то, что это норм.…
бойкот приостановлен.
Channel name was changed to «🔒 ◇ woah､ young posse ！！»
они закрыли комментарии к посту-рекламе, под которым вы оставляли комментарии, обличая их. и админы банят тех, кто пишет об этом (док-во скинули в комментариях) как я поняла, админы поменялись, и они сразу забили на бойкот, выложив видео с ссылкой на официальный канал на ютубе, рекламу, а потом переслали старое извинение касательно дипфейков ВСЕХ артистов rbw. и да, мы тут уже не надеемся на личные извинения нашим …
а можно повторить, куда заработок в карман пойдет после самопровозглашенной отмены бойкота? и «никогда не забудем» прошло довольно быстро, когда их попросили прорекламировать концерты 👍
Мне кажется, это было сделано для того, чтобы потом они прорекламировали билеты.....
я и так забанена на оффке по некоторым причинам, поэтому мне нечего терять, учитывая, что этот канал закрыт. бойкот НЕ заканчивался у руфд, и НЕ заканчивается. этот крупный канал самолично решил закончить бойкот, имея довольно большую фанбазу. мы НЕ получили прямых извинений, о которых говорится в посте, это просто ложь в лицо. единственное извинение было общим, и еще давно я сюда его выкладывала. оно никак не каса…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @woahyp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,246,146 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@woahyp named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“woah､ young posse ！！” (@woahyp), 188 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/woahyp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.