Channel
@wmiddelkooptweets
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
698subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001314742742 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wmiddelkooptweets |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wmiddelkooptweets |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 698 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 700 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 700 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,499 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
RT @MBAeconomics1: Tomorrow, August 7th, President Donald Trump is hosting a critical mineral roundtable at the U.S. State Department with over 100 mining executives attending. As of now, we know that Rio Tinto and BHP will be in attendance. Topics of conversation include financing deals to advance critical minerals projects. As well as efforts to keep projects commercially viable. Governments have been exploring …
RT @SternDrewCrypto: 🚨 The Moment Trump Leaves the Iran War, the Petrodollar Dies Forever Professor Jiang explains how the US economy is a giant Ponzi scheme dependent on Gulf nations investing in American tech. If Iran forces the Gulf to abandon the petrodollar for food security, the US economy will face total collapse and revolution in the streets. Jeff Currie, former Goldman Sachs head of commodities and lifelon…
RT @DeItaone: BOFA SEES URANIUM RALLY CONTINUING 🔸BofA raised its 2027 uranium price forecast to $130/lb, implying ~52% upside from current spot prices. 🔸Bullish view is driven by tight supply, lower utility contract coverage (48% vs. 56% last year), and growing nuclear investment. 🔸U.S. plans include 400GW nuclear capacity by 2050, 10 new AP1000 reactors, and $2.7B for domestic enrichment. 🔸BofA maintained Buy on C…
Photo, posted without a caption
RT @Glenn_Diesen: Trump threatens to hunt down and jail people who argue that the U.S. weapons stockpiles are being depleted. https://t.co/GcT71ktKd2 original tweet by wmiddelkoop:
Photo, posted without a caption
RT @chigrl: @PipCzar 0. Look with this new Iran declaration of a toll and Lloyds list group of insurers saying vessels will lose their insurance if a toll is imposed. This literally paralyzes traffic. https://t.co/R6bFXAf3f7 original tweet by wmiddelkoop:
RT @HormuzLetter: BREAKING: Iran has just struck 2 "hostile" targets in the Strait of Hormuz, with the likely targets being the oil tankers NISSOS KEA and NISSOS KEROS that were transiting via the southern Omani US-backed corridor under US escort and AIS switched off in the past hour, per Tasnim. Iran adds "the achievements of this operation by our brave forces will be announced to the public in the coming hours." …
Photo, posted without a caption
RT @zerohedge: Silver's Resurgence "May Force Systematic Short-Covering"; Goldman https://t.co/b5sN6pU4R5 original tweet by wmiddelkoop:
RT @DeItaone: GHALIBAF: 'THEATER DIPLOMACY' WON'T WORK Iranian Parliament Speaker Ghalibaf criticized U.S. tactics, saying: “Massive attack coming… wait, never mind, they want to negotiate.” That’s theater diplomacy on loop. He added: “Using bullying + broken promises + fake news as leverage is a failed strategy. Acknowledge the facts and fulfill your commitments. We don’t need more theater.” original tweet by w…
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wmiddelkooptweets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 793,619 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@wmiddelkooptweets named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Willem Middelkoop Tweets” (@wmiddelkooptweets), 698 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wmiddelkooptweets.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.