Channel
@wlwclublovee
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
66subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003790836848 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wlwclublovee |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wlwclublovee |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:00 | 66 | +2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 64 | +8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 56 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 53 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 53 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
71 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 26 | 36.6% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 25.4% | |
| custom 5336830090317681614 | 10 | 14.1% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 8.45% | |
| custom 5337182320585627247 | 4 | 5.63% | |
| 💋 | 4 | 5.63% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 4.23% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
эта малолетняя уебанка которой максимум лет 12, ущемилось тем, что не верит в существование людей старше себя начала мне в личке писать что мол якобы тоже лесбиянка и мужененавистница (дадад, так я ей и поверила), а потом следом же сразу прилетает этот максимально НАИТУПЕЙШИЙ вопрос про возраст вот зачем так палиться… прекрасно видно что эта ебанушка из тех лесбофобных мразей
custom 53368300903176816144
ебать она блять ебанутая, я пиздец в афиге с таких для таких конченных все, кто проявляет хоть капельку агрессиии автоматически становится малолеткой??? АХАХХААХХАЗАХАХАХПХ вот щас все, кто лично меня знает, посмотрите на эту клоуниху которая не может поверить в существование людей старше 14-15 лет это же насколько надо быть тупой, чтобы не понимать что все люди разные, разный характер, темперамент, реакция, разный с…
custom 53368300903176816144custom 53371823205856272474
пиздят как дышат, они всё выкладывают, еще и доксили меня) Че канал закрыли то, чето зассали ахазаз
❤5
ЭЭЭАААА У МЕНЯ СЕГОДНЯ ТАКЖЕ ДОЛЖНО БЫЛО БЫТЬ🥹
💘5
🤪
❤6
Voice message, posted without a caption
💘7🔥3❤2custom 53368300903176816142
Happy birthday to meee🥰🎉🎉🎂🎂
🥰6💋4💘2❤1
была бы у меня девушка, у меня бы был сегодня сесбиан лекс🥹❤️
💘5❤2
хочу сказать, что мне очень приятно что вы мне желаете найти себе девушку💋🥰 для меня это самое важное!! Спасибооо так быстрее найду🙏🏻
💘7❤2
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @wlwclublovee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝘸𝘭𝘸 𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘣👩❤️💋👩” (@wlwclublovee), 66 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wlwclublovee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.