Channel
@wizardsworks
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
189subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002124062299 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wizardsworks |
| Description | По поводу заказов: @mingvari Группа Vk: https://m.vk.com/wizwork Делаем косплей костюмы и аксессуары на заказ, печатаем в 3D разное, режем всякое на лазере и не только. |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wizardsworks |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 189 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 189 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 10 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
174 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 76 | 43.7% | |
| 🔥 | 49 | 28.2% | |
| 👍 | 33 | 19.0% | |
| 💅 | 6 | 3.45% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 1.72% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 1.72% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 1.15% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 1.15% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 174reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥 Друзья, решили сделать небольшую акцию! Есть несколько проектов, которые мы очень хотим наконец-то реализовать. Когда мы переезжали в новую мастерскую, часть заказов так и не состоялась, хотя подготовка к ним уже была практически завершена. Для большинства проектов уже готовы 3D-модели, а некоторые детали даже успели напечатать. С тех пор материалы и стоимость работы заметно выросли. Но именно для этих проектов …
❤6👀3✍2
Только что закончили один очень интересный проект и просто не можем не показать небольшой тизер! Подробности, процесс создания и больше фотографий будут уже совсем скоро. Ну а пока проверка на олдовость. Узнали персонажа? :D
👍6🔥6❤1
Закончили проект и показываем как правильно надевать маску. Спойлер: голова манекена с этим не согласилась
❤8🔥3🤣3
Работаем над маской Человека-бензопилы. Собрана, загрунтована, далее электроника и покраска
🔥13❤6💅2👍1
Новые доспехи в работе. Комбинируем 3д печать Абс и Тпу - жёсткая основа там где нужна форма и гибкий материал там где броня должна быть эластичной. Для нас это эксперимент, так как раньше Тпу в косплейных проектах не использовали. Посмотрим что выйдет. Будет полный комплект. Продолжение скоро )
❤8🔥4👍1
Новый проект который тихо растет фоном. Каркас для крыльев печатали частями, потом склеивали в одну конструкцию. Выглядит пока как скелет. Дальше обтяжка и покраска и это будет совсем другая история ;-)
🔥14❤8👍5🤡2
Тренды добрались и до нас! Печатаем прямо на ткани- тестируем. Кое-что интересное скоро будет
❤14👍3🔥2
Карты с подсветкой это вообще отдельная история. Перебрали несколько вариантов подсветки и попутно решили задачу с питанием. Крышка снимается, держится на неодимовых магнитах. Можно менять батарейки. Коса и остальные аксессуары Сиэль из Expedition 33 - скоро.
❤11👍8🔥7
Иногда один пакет мелких деталей выглядит страшнее целого проекта. Кто понял, для чего печатаем эту орду шипастых малышей? :-)
❤6👍6
Экспериментируя с 3д печатью, кажется, мы нашли самый атмосферный пластик. Светится в темноте. Без электроники, батареек и проводов. Это люминесцентный PLA. Накапливает свет от лампы или солнца, а потом какое-то время светится в темноте. Светится не супер ярко, но атмосферно. Для декора и всяких интерьерных штук - самое то. Напечатали тестовые таблички аварийного выхода и Кодама из «Принцессы Мононоке». Как думаете,…
❤8💅4👍3
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @wizardsworks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 431,848 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wizard’s workshop - косплей и не только” (@wizardsworks), 189 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wizardsworks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.