Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
4 measurements spanning 18 days, net +166. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 401–702 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Oct 2026, 16:56
602
+54
19 Oct 2026, 19:50
548
-119
13 Oct 2026, 09:29
667
+231
9 Oct 2026, 23:22
436
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 2 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.1%
avg views ÷ 602 subscribers
Avg views / post
139
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
80.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026
Posts held
9 (2 September 2026 – 6 October 2026)
Views total
417
Reactions total
336
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Oct 2026, 23:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 39s
Average length
33s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
797 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5420163103084019890
241
30.2%
custom 5280644547922133626
143
17.9%
custom 5357471179156245353
127
15.9%
custom 5440592986905802011
124
15.6%
custom 5348530805297682412
90
11.3%
custom 5235887505479320463
72
9.03%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 797 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 9 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @with_love_diana. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 September 2026 to 6 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Мой челлендж продолжается 🤎
Пока стараюсь не выпадать из режима и постепенно добавляю новые привычки в обычную жизнь.
🩶Сохраняю утреннюю лимфодренажную рутину, каждый день снимаю небольшой видеоотчёт и стала больше двигаться в течение дня:
— гуляю пешком;
— хожу на танцы;
— по возможности выбираю лестницу вместо лифта;
— считаю КБЖУ;
— в дороге слушаю аудиокниги вместо музыки.
Последнее, кстати, оказалось неожидан…
Day 1 🌟
Итоги моего первого дня:
В первую очередь решила заняться здоровьем и телом:
— начала считать калории;
— убрала вредную еду и напитки;
— добавила МФР с мячиком и аппликатор Кузнецова;
— начала следить за питьевым режимом.
Моя цель — выпивать 2 литра в день, но сегодня получилось только около 1 литра. Пока не идеально, но я хотя бы начала обращать на это внимание
Работала я из дома. В перерывах занималась д…
Я создала планер для тех, кто хочет за ближайшие 6 месяцев не просто поставить цели, а действительно начать двигаться к ним 📝
Внутри:
— точка старта и цели;
— фокус на 2–3 сферах;
— план действий на 6 месяцев;
— трекер привычек и недель;
— контрольные точки каждые 30 дней.
Можно распечатать или заполнять прямо на телефоне 🤍
Забирай журнал и присоединяйся к челленджу ✨
Я начинаю свою перезагрузку по теории 6 months 🤍
🤩Осень — время, когда после активного лета особенно хочется немного остановиться, собрать себя, что-то изменить и наконец заняться тем, что давно откладывал.
Изменить привычки, тело, режим, начать курс, заняться здоровьем или просто почувствовать, что ты снова управляешь своей жизнью.
Я решила глубже изучить подход 6 months и для своего удобства создала собственный …
🤍Вы слышали про теорию 6 месяцев?
Недавно я случайно наткнулась на концепцию, которая сейчас довольно часто встречается в зарубежном интернете: 6 month challenge, 180 days challenge, Project 180.
Смысл у всех этих форматов примерно один: вместо попытки полностью изменить свою жизнь за пару недель ты даёшь себе 6 месяцев и используешь это время, чтобы постепенно двигаться к той версии себя и жизни, которую хочешь по…
Выбирала обувь на осень🍂
Словила какой-то гиперфикс на замше🩶
Я очень люблю массивную обувь на шнуровке 🥾, но в этот раз я сделала исключение.
Взяла первые в своей жизни казачки 👠
Мы наконец-то сходили на нового Паучка 🕷️🍿
К слову, в будние дни найти свободный сеанс было практически невозможно — всё забито!
Но мы все же смогли 😎
И я в восторге🔥
По моему мнению эта часть - лучшая среди всех предыдущих: персонажи уже не играют школьников, хорошо раскрыта тема одиночества и внутренних кризисов. Потрясающая актерская игра Сэнди Синк, которая вытягивает на себе почти весь драматический сюжет.
А…
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @with_love_diana. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“With love, Diana” (@with_love_diana), 602 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/with_love_diana.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
