Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Korean With Abror 🇰🇷 | 🇺🇿

@with_abror

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

285subscribers

+31 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002608778423
TypeChannel
Username@with_abror
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/with_abror

Growth

2532852697 August 2026 — 254 subscribers7 August 2026 — 253 subscribers8 August 2026 — 253 subscribers14 August 2026 — 285 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 248–290 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 18:34285+32
8 Aug 2026, 09:19253no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:23253-1
7 Aug 2026, 16:17254first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 24 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.8%
avg views ÷ 285 subscribers
Avg views / post
87.7
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held14 (24 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total263
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14m 30s
Average length
14m 30s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

70 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2028.6%
1622.9%
1420.0%
👍710.0%
👏68.57%
😨45.71%
😭22.86%
🏆11.43%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC59 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @withabror_resultPhoto

#SKA 듣기 74/200 읽기 86/200 쓰기 15/200 말하기 18/200 @withabror_result

👍4👏21

1 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC110 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @withabror_resultPhoto

D-2-1 Kasbiy ta’lim Topik2 ATAKHONOV AYUBKHON @withabror_result

👍2🔥2

31 Jul 2026, 04:45 UTC94 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @topik_kecPhoto

https://topiktashkec.uz/uz/announcing/84

1🔥1

11 Jul 2026, 05:47 UTC171 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @topik_kec

❗️ Внимание! ❗️ Регистрация на 108й экзамен продолжается. В Ферганском корейском международном университете осталось 145 мест. 📢 ❗️ DIQQAT! ❗️ 108-TOPIK imtihoniga roʻyxatdan oʻtish davom etmoqda! Fargʻona Koreya xalqaro universitetida 145 ta joy qoldi.

😨3

10 Jul 2026, 09:11 UTC162 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#7인간관계 격려– qo’llab-quvvatlash 남– begona, boshqalar 남매– og’a-ini 남성– erkak 너희– sizlar 다투다– urishmoq gap bilan 당신– siz (hurmat) 대접하다– mexmon qilmoq 돌보다–g’amxo’rlik qilmoq 며느리– kelin 무시–mensimaslik 바보– jinni 배려– yon berish, e'tibor berish 배우자– turmush o’rtoq 보살피다– qaramoq, g’amxo’rlik qilmoq 본인– o’zi 부부– er- hotin 사위–kuyov 사이– munosabat, oraliq 사촌– ammavachcha, xolavachcha 상대방– partnyor,suxbatdosh서로– o’zaro 성인– katta (

🔥2

10 Jul 2026, 03:47 UTC135 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

‼️Bugun 19:00da 108-TOPIK(PBT) imtihoniga registratsiya bo’ladi. Hammaga omad! topiktashkec.uz

👏31🔥1

9 Jul 2026, 23:29 UTC136 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

#PODCAST10 새해 목표 Bu vidio orqali eshitish “듣기“ qobiliyatingizni rivojlantirishda yordam beradi. Hamda so’z boyligingizni “어휘력“ oshirishda yordam beradi. Videoni 1 marta ko’rgandan keyin bilmagan so’zlarni yodlab yana qayta ko’ring. 🇰🇷 Koreys tilini o’rganayotgan do’stlaringizga ham ulashing. Instagram Telegram

1🔥1

30 Jun 2026, 12:35 UTC165 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📚KOREAN WORDS #6인생 겪다– boshidan o’tkazmoq 기혼– oilali 노인– qari kishi 늙다– qarimoq 독신– yolg’iz 미혼– bo’ydoq 사망– o’lim 삶– hayot 성숙– yetilgan bo’lmoq 성장– o’smoq, ulg’aymoq 세월– vaqt 신혼– yangi turmush 아동– yosh bola 6-10gacha 연령– yosh 이별 – ajrashmoq (sevishganlar) 이혼– ajrashmoq 인생– hayot 자라다– o’smoq 젊은이– yosh kishi 청년– o’spirin 청소년– o`smir yoshlar 축복하다– baxt tilamoq 평생– butun umr @with_abror

2👍1

30 Jun 2026, 05:40 UTC112 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @topik_kecPhoto

https://topiktashkec.uz/uz/announcing/81

28 Jun 2026, 14:55 UTC150 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📚KOREANWORDS #5외모 개성– shaxsiyat 개성이 있다, 개성이 강하다 겉–tashqi tomon 속 -ichki tomon 곱다– chiroyli 미인– go’zal 미남- kelishgan yigit 아담하다–xushbichim, o’rta bo’yli 외모– tashqi ko’rinish =겉모습 인상– tassurot 첫인상 -ilk taasurot 통통하다–semiz, 표정– yuz ifodasi @with_abror

🔥21🏆1

28 Jun 2026, 07:51 UTC121 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🇰🇷Koreys tilida ranglar @with_abror

3🔥31

27 Jun 2026, 14:20 UTC148 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📚KOREA WORDS #4성격 고집– injiqlik 긍정적– pozitiv (ijobiy) 까다롭다– injiq,mukammal 꼼꼼하다– tartibli 냉정하다–sovuqqon 단점– minus tomonlari 매력– jozibador 무뚝뚝하다– qo’pol 부정적– salbiy 부주의– e'tiborga olmaslik 부지런하다– mehnatkash bolish 사교적– tez chiqishadiggan 성실– samimiylik 소심하다– ko’ngli tor 솔직하다– rostini aytmoq 순수– toza 씩씩하다– doim kuchga to’la (energichniy) 알뜰– tejash 얌전하다– oddiy (insonga nisbatan) 엄격하다– qattiqqo’l 엉뚱하다– g’alati, bo

3🔥3👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @with_abror. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 376,239 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Korean With Abror 🇰🇷 | 🇺🇿” (@with_abror), 285 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/with_abror.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.