Сумбурные, но важные размышления на тему того, почему и как мы скачем между ветками реальности, сами того не замечая
custom 53547925497876494269custom 52967420810525486106custom 54608791868916475095

Channel
@witchykeys
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
402subscribers
+32 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003899810008 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @witchykeys |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 23 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/witchykeys |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:01 | 402 | +7 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 06:36 | 395 | +5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 390 | +8 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 382 | +6 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 376 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:20 | 370 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 370 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
587 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5460879186891647509 | 232 | 39.5% | |
| custom 5354792549787649426 | 149 | 25.4% | |
| custom 5353066170503142084 | 74 | 12.6% | |
| custom 5355219705760073018 | 44 | 7.50% | |
| custom 5354971413700680895 | 31 | 5.28% | |
| custom 5357410658772065698 | 20 | 3.41% | |
| custom 5296742081052548610 | 15 | 2.56% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 2.39% | |
| custom 5353060840448727534 | 8 | 1.36% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 587 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @witchykeys. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Сумбурные, но важные размышления на тему того, почему и как мы скачем между ветками реальности, сами того не замечая
custom 53547925497876494269custom 52967420810525486106custom 54608791868916475095
На удивление трогательный рассказ Н. Хейл Реальнее жизни о призраках, которым удалось ощутить радость любви после смерти (не скрою, я пропускала приторные куски, я такое не люблю, бррр) За тривиальной концепцией романтической новеллы я рассмотрела глубокий смысл. Иногда нам кажется, что мы умерли. Что больше ничего не сможем почувствовать, а если сможем, это обязательно оборвется очень скоро, причинив сильную боль. …
custom 546087918689164750919custom 535479254978764942616custom 53574106587720656983
Про концепцию «достаточно» Что мы делаем в это полнолуние 🖤🤩
custom 535306617050314208415custom 53552197057600730188custom 54608791868916475091
У нас полнолуние в Козероге, ведьмы и ведьмаки 🧙🏻♂️ Любимое время всех трудоголиков, чтобы упахаться)) Что я благополучно и сделала) Желаю вам, чтобы вам всегда было ДОСТАТОЧНО Ибо мне вечно кажется, что нужно еще) Изобилие ≠ достаток. Оказалось, одно с другим в комплекте не идет! Пусть будет достаточно любви Достаточно денег Достаточно здоровья Достаточно энергии Достаточно всего, что вы применяете, дабы создат…
custom 546087918689164750941custom 53549714137006808956custom 53574106587720656984custom 53547925497876494262custom 53530608404487275341
Posted without readable text
custom 546087918689164750926custom 535479254978764942616custom 53530661705031420842
Книжные рецензии 👻 Сейчас параллельно у меня идут две книги: бестселлер Р. Грина я переслушиваю в аудио формате и считаю необходимым делать это раз в несколько лет. Очень здорово отрезвляет и спускает «с небес на землю». В то же время готический сборник новелл разношерстных авторов погружает в мрачную атмосферу в стиле По, Кинга, М.Шелли, О. Уайльда. Не все, конечно, но большинство новелл достойные, поэтому любителя…
custom 53549714137006808959custom 53574106587720656986custom 52967420810525486104custom 53547925497876494261
Пишем сегодня практику для счастливых отношений Важное нововведение, без которого отношения не будут кайфовыми на 100%
custom 546087918689164750923custom 53552197057600730189custom 53574106587720656985custom 52967420810525486101
Сегодня отдыхаем, друзья.
custom 546087918689164750922custom 53547925497876494265custom 53530608404487275342
Что делать в темный час Сохраните это голосовое
custom 535479254978764942622custom 53552197057600730184custom 54608791868916475093
Что не может быть закрытым источником
custom 535306617050314208415custom 53552197057600730185custom 54608791868916475091
Феномен «закрытого источника» Опасная ловушка Задание 😎🤌
custom 535497141370068089514custom 53530661705031420847custom 54608791868916475094
Posted without readable text
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @witchykeys. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Хочу:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ключи Ведьмы” (@witchykeys), 402 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/witchykeys.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.