2 Jul 2026, 11:14 UTC28 viewsread 8 August 2026
Most people leave crypto after their first brutal cycle. A few stay. An even smaller group keeps stacking in silence. Those are usually the names you hear about years later.
Channel
Wister- Trades
@wister_00
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
267subscribers
-60 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002625103224 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wister_00 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wister_00 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 267 | -16 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:12 | 283 | -31 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 314 | -12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 326 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 327 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 327 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
10 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 4 | 40.0% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 30.0% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 10.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 10.0% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 2 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
22 Jun 2026, 14:42 UTC31 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Been getting asked where I think $BTC bottoms if we see another flush. Here's my game plan. The sweep of the $60k lows already triggered a strong buy signal on my system. That's not a full-send signal, it's a signal to stay patient, not ape into green candles. Could we still print a lower low? Absolutely. As long as we're below the macro downtrend, nothing is confirmed. What matters is that the sweep came with a …
🔥1
21 Jun 2026, 08:17 UTC25 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
If you aped $1K into $ZERO when I first called it, you'd be sitting on $10K+ rn. That's literally how I ran my bag to $47K+ on few days ago... and it's still printing another $15K+ because I ain't faded it. Still not selling. DYOR. $ZERO is an absolute gem. I still think $100M+ MC is programmed.
19 Jun 2026, 19:40 UTC24 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
$BURNIE been one of the more watched meme narratives this week. chart wise, the dip got bought pretty quick and mcap is still holding above the recent expansion zone. volume cooled off after the first rip, but engagement on ct is staying elevated. the "soviet sleeper agent / ai doomer" is weird enough to stand out in a sea of recycled memes, and elon keeps casually interacting with content around it. not saying th…
16 Jun 2026, 13:05 UTC14 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video
🐋 BIGGEST SPCX69 BUYS 🕗 LAST HOUR: 👑 $1.2K Buyer / Txn 2️⃣ $877 Buyer / Txn 3️⃣ $804 Buyer / Txn 🗓 LAST 24 HOURS: 👑 $4.2K Buyer / Txn 2️⃣ $2.6K Buyer / Txn 3️⃣ $1.8K Buyer / Txn 📊Chart | 🕵️ Calls |🏆 Trending
16 Jun 2026, 12:59 UTC10 viewsread 8 August 2026
5 million
16 Jun 2026, 12:56 UTC10 viewsread 8 August 2026
SPCXwBHVrKpRqMRawL3NNvt1sXP2Yf3edwRbta53N69
16 Jun 2026, 12:56 UTC12 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
16 Jun 2026, 12:55 UTC11 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
been around long enough to know the strongest charts usually don't announce themselves. what catches my eye here is the way dips keep getting bought and structure keeps improving. $SPCX69 plenty of projects can print one big green candle. much harder to sustain momentum, attract fresh participants and hold higher levels after the initial excitement fades. so far this one is doing exactly that. still a lot to prov…
15 Jun 2026, 12:45 UTC9 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo
still consolidating after the send from $28m -> $51m honestly not much changed here $MANIFEST bulls have been defending the $36m area pretty aggressively, every flush below gets bought back up next thing i wanna see is a reclaim of $40m-$41m and ideally a close above there if we flip that level back into support i think a squeeze toward $44m-$45m comes fast, from there its pretty easy to see a move back toward th…
🔥1
15 Jun 2026, 07:55 UTC235 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
been digging into this one for a bit and honestly the concept keeps making more sense the deeper i go. everyone talks about decentralized AI but most projects don't seem to get past the narrative stage. c0mpute at least has a working product, active devs and an actual network participants can join. the torrent comparison is interesting too. instead of a few giant datacenters handling everything, they're trying to r…
❤1👏1🔥1
15 Jun 2026, 07:43 UTC248 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo
another one that’s been cooking under the radar ngl. narrative actually got some legs, team seems locked in, devs still shipping and not just farming engagement. been stalking the updates for a minute and they keep building instead of yapping. that's usually what I wanna see. community vibes are solid too. holders look unusually patient for this market, not seeing constant panic exits every red candle. feels like p…
❤1👍1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @wister_00. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wister- Trades” (@wister_00), 267 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wister_00.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.