Channel
@wir_sind_so_frei
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
154subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003111811490 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wir_sind_so_frei |
| Description | … eine eigene Meinung zu haben. |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wir_sind_so_frei |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 154 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:50 | 154 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (19 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,361 |
| Reactions total | 21 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
24 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 10 | 41.7% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 20.8% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 16.7% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 12.5% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Anthony Fauci, der skrupellose Papst der Coronalügen, sah ihn Karl Lauterbach „so etwas wie einen Freund“. Das geht aus Faucis Tagebüchern hervor, die in die Hände der US Regierung gelangt sind. Die Freundschaften, die man pflegt, sagen viel über einen aus. Und von Fauci „Freund“ genannt zu werden, rückt Lauterbach nun in die Nähe eines der skrupellosesten und verabscheuungswürdigsten Menschen der jüngeren Geschicht…
❤1🤬1
Das braucht keinen Kommentar. 💯 Zustimmung!
Mein Sommerhit 2026 😊
Anthony Fauci, das Mastermind hinter den Corona-Verbrechen, hat sich geweigert vor dem US Kongress für eine Befragung zu erscheinen. Darum wurde er per Gerichtsbeschluss dazu gezwungen. Bei der Anhörung hat er dann auf jede einzelne Frage - insgesamt 111 Mal - von seinem Zeugnisverweigerungsrecht nach dem 5. Verfassungszusatz Gebrauch gemacht. Das besagt, dass man die Aussage verweigern kann, wenn man sich damit sel…
👍4❤1
Deutschland ist das geworden, was unsere Politiker Russland oft vorgeworfen haben. Oppositionelle von der Wahl ausschließen - Check Hausdurchsuchungen bei Oppositionspolitikern - Check Fehlen nur noch die Verhaftungen von Oppositionspolitikern. Mal sehen, wann die kommen? Und auch diese Aussage macht einen wahrscheinlich schon wieder zu einem Fall für den Verfassungsschutz. Das Offensichtliche auszusprechen ist in …
👍2
Nicklas Nilsson erklärt den Unterschied zwischen Rechten und Linken in einem makellosen Text auf Facebook: „Wenn ein rechtspolitischer Mensch schwul ist, dann ist er das, und es ist ihm egal, was andere denken. Wenn ein Linker schwul ist, dann fordert er Gesetzesänderungen, protestiert gegen alles und jeden und macht daraus einen politischen Kampf. Wenn ein Rechter Veganer ist, dann isst er einfach kein Fleisch. We…
🤣3
Die Berliner Abrissbrigade rollt unaufhaltsam. Leider haben die Neustadter bei den letzten Wahlen mit großer Mehrheit genau die Parteien gewählt, die unser Land in die Grütze geritten haben. Wieviel Schmerz braucht es noch, bis ein Aufwachprozess einsetzt? https://www.np-coburg.de/inhalt.rolly-toys-in-neustadt-familienunternehmen-schliesst-ende-des-jahres.e0ec8726-a90d-4ce1-9aa8-4aa90176753d.html
💯2
Es ist ein dritter Bus in Planung mit Haltestelle Lichtenfels/Kronach/Naila. Falls Interesse besteht, bitte dringend PN an mich. DANKE! Silvia
„1.000.000 Stimmen für den Frieden“ – das klingt wie ein großer Traum, aber eben auch wie eine wichtige Botschaft. Wenn die Mächtigen dieser Welt Kriege anfeuern, brauchen wir mutige Menschen, die sich offen für den Frieden einsetzen. Jede Stimme zählt, egal ob groß oder klein, laut oder leise. Gemeinsam können wir zeigen, dass wir genug haben von Gewalt und Krieg und stattdessen auf Verständigung und Zusammenhalt …
❤1👍1
ARBEIT DES VERFASSUNGSSCHUTZES MIT INTERNATIONALEN RECHTSSTANDARDS NICHT VEREINBAR Die UN-Sonderberichterstatterin für Meinungsfreiheit, Irene Khan, hat den deutschen Verfassungsschutz unter die Lupe genommen. In ihrem Bericht vom 10. Juni 2026 schreibt sie dazu völlig zutreffend: „46. Die Sonderberichterstatterin ist besorgt, dass vage, übermäßig weite oder undefinierte Begriffe und Politiken die Entscheidungen zu…
👍2❤1
400.000 Menschen haben innerhalb eines Monats eine Petition für den Stopp der Massenzuwanderung unterschrieben. Aber die EU-Kommission unter Ursula von der Leyen (CDU) weigert sich, diese Petition überhaupt anzunehmen. Weil sie angeblich europäischen „Werten“ widerspricht. Dann wissen wir ja jetzt, was diese ominösen „europäischen Werte“ sind. Massenmigration überwiegend ungebildeter junger Männer aus fremden Kultu…
🤬2
Um zu begreifen, was Jens Spahn und Daniel Funke sich da unter Umgehung der deutschen Rechtslage „gegönnt“ haben, sollte man diese von Birgit Kelle recherchierten Fakten kennen. Da überkommen einen abwechselnd die kalte Wut und das kalte Kotzen. 😡🤮 Der Rücktritt, so überfällig er war, ist da keine angemessene Konsequenz. Die Melonie-Regierung in Italien hat übrigens gerade ein Gesetz erlassen, nach dem solche Stun…
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @wir_sind_so_frei. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wir sind so frei …” (@wir_sind_so_frei), 154 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wir_sind_so_frei.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.