Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for میکس VIP وینتربت

Channel

میکس VIP وینتربت

@winter_bet

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

179subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001111085947
TypeChannel
Username@winter_bet
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 30 November 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded27 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/winter_bet

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

17818017927 August 2026 — 178 subscribers27 August 2026 — 178 subscribers6 September 2026 — 180 subscribers13 September 2026 — 179 subscribers27 August 202613 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 178–180 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 19:37179-1
6 Sept 2026, 21:19180+2
27 Aug 2026, 09:15178no change
27 Aug 2026, 09:01178first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍133.3%
👏133.3%
🔥133.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Jul 2026, 22:50 UTC78 views1 reactionsread 27 August 2026

به هرحال جام جهانی تموم شد و انصافاً هم حق به حقدار رسید.. همونطور که خودتونم میدونین جام جهانی و درکل تورنومنت های ملی برای بت زدن خوب نیست، سود تو باشگاهیه. من به شخصه بیشتر برای هیجانی شدنش میزدم و البته اون کرم بت زنی😂 فعلا میریم استراحت تا شروع لیگهای باشگاهی، انشالله امسال با روال جدید برمیگردم. درواقع ریسکی نمیندم دیگه، رنج ضریب رو میذارم روی حوالی۲ ، ۱.۵۰ تا ۲.۵۰ اینطوری ببنده آدم و طمع نکنه انصافا سودمیده…

👏1

19 Jul 2026, 22:43 UTC78 viewsread 27 August 2026

ولی در کل بد نبود، من خودم ۶تومن بردم، ۳ تومن باختم، ۳تومن سود...

19 Jul 2026, 21:27 UTC68 viewsread 27 August 2026

من طرفدار آرژانتینم (البته تیم اولم ایتالیاست که خاااک بر سرش فعلا😂) ولی انصاف رو رعایت کنیم قهرمانی حق آرژانتین نیست،‌لامصب حرام بال هم حدی داره! از جام جهانی ۹۴ دارم فوتبال میبینم، تابحال همچین فینال یک طرفه‌ای ندیدم! حتی فرانسه - کرواسی ۲۰۱۸ هم اینقدر یکطرفه نبود بخدا!🤦‍♂ یا مثلا ۱۹۹۸ که فرانسه ۳-۰ برزیل رو برد، باز توپ و حملات بیشتر دست برزیل بود. یا فینال ۲۰۰۲ آلمان حداقل چندتا موقعیت داشت و اینقدر تو لاک دفاع…

19 Jul 2026, 21:22 UTC66 views2 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

نیمه اول گل دربیاد، گل دومم درمیاد چون اسپانیا بزنه آرژانتین مجبوره بیاد جلو برای جبران و ممکنه بخوره دومی رو

👍1🔥1

19 Jul 2026, 20:56 UTC42 viewsread 27 August 2026

بازی طوریه که آدم جرات نمیکنه چیزی رو لایو بزنه

19 Jul 2026, 18:31 UTC44 viewsread 27 August 2026

البته با شروع بازی و مشخص شدن روندش، لایو هم‌ میزنم و میذارم اینجا، ولی درکل به اندازه دیشب فکر نکنم خوش شانس باشیم، چون روند فینال وبا رده بندی خیلی فرق داره.

19 Jul 2026, 18:29 UTC42 viewsread 27 August 2026

⚠️ امروز من هرچی زدم حسیه ها بیشتر، منظورم زیاد روش حساب نکنین

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @winter_bet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

کانال خبری انجمن ایثارگران ایران
@anjoman_iranisaar · 45,933
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“میکس VIP وینتربت” (@winter_bet), 179 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/winter_bet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.