Channel
@wine_stained
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
106subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002712865776 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wine_stained |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wine_stained |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 106 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 106 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 28 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
47 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 38 | 80.9% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 6.38% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 4.26% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 2.13% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 2.13% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 2.13% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 2.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 28 December 2025 to 16 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wine_stained. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 December 2025 to 16 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
В другом своем канале я разобрал отчет о журналистике в современном мире и вдруг осознал, что как бы хорошо AI не умел агрегировать, пересказывать и обобщать, но только и только читатель выбирает, кому верить. Это означает, что в эпоху AI выигрывает тот, у кого есть свой узнаваемый стиль, повторяемый нарратив и последовательная позиция. 🏅Выигрывает тот, у кого есть голос и доверие P.S. Пост по ссылке
❤6🫡1
Мне очень хотелось написать кликбейтный заголовок: "Не ставь цели на год пока..." или что-то вроде этого, но я не буду. Итак, 2026 официально начат, а в новый год все конечно ставят цели и строят планы. Вот об этом сегодня и поговорим Что же такое цель? Цель отвечает на вопрос: «Что я хочу получить?». Куча книг написана про то как ставить цели, но в них редко упоминается, что классическая постановка целей (SMART и …
❤9🔥1
Картинки. Белград. Зима’25-26.
❤18
🎄 Поздравляю с наступившим Новым годом! Новый год — это отличное время попробовать что-то новое… или отпустить старое. Я решил расстаться с частью своей коллекции плёночных фотоаппаратов и предлагаю их по хорошей цене в заботливые руки. Canon AE-1 Program - Мой первый серьёзный плёночник. Прошёл со мной огонь и воду афган, но полностью рабочий и в хорошем состоянии. Canon A-1 старший брат AE-1, с продвинутой автом…
⚡1❤🔥1🎉1
#словодня Обесценивание — лишить значимости, важности, сделать ненужным. Это по словарю, а для меня это бесконечный источник пустоты. Ненасыщаемая черная дыра Не радуешься своим результатам → не можешь ценить успехи близких → планка снова выше → и ты опять «недостаточно» → ещё дальше отталкиваешь от себя других → 💥Бинго. Круг замкнулся! ✍️ Напишите в комментариях, как вы обесцениваете себя или других
Я продолжаю собирать свою методичку о том, как жить эту прекрасную жизнь: - Правило 0. Уметь проживать потери - Правило 1. Все, что у тебя есть - это сейчас. Живи сейчас! - Правило 2. Развивай мультипарадигмальность, не бойся ошибаться и не переставай учиться В следующих частях будет про выбор, дисциплину, фокус и любовь к себе. 🤩 Stay tuned! Ну а пока, напомню, что вы можете проголосовать за канал. Вам бесплатно, …
👍3❤2
Channel name was changed to «Блокнот в винных пятнах»
Блокнот в винных пятнах pinned a photo
Развивай мультипарадигмальность, не бойся ошибаться и не переставай учиться. [Часть 2/2] 🐞Ошибки На пути познания мира, да и вообще в ходе жизни, ошибки неизбежны. Важно помнить, что правота, это оценка в рамках какой-то зафиксированной парадигмы и при глубоком анализе, становится эфемерной и чересчур зависимой от контекста. Ошибки, напротив, таковыми не являются. Ошибки, это вовсе не про неправоту, а про сам процес…
❤3🔥1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @wine_stained. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 625,895 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Блокнот в винных пятнах” (@wine_stained), 106 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wine_stained.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.