Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 64 days, net +67. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 241–330 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Oct 2026, 16:07
318
+2
19 Oct 2026, 15:27
316
+1
12 Oct 2026, 20:59
315
-5
2 Oct 2026, 12:36
320
+13
18 Sept 2026, 16:00
307
-3
10 Sept 2026, 01:55
310
+3
1 Sept 2026, 12:08
307
+49
25 Aug 2026, 06:43
258
+7
25 Aug 2026, 01:45
251
no change
25 Aug 2026, 01:30
251
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
32 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
16
50.0%
🔥
13
40.6%
👍
3
9.38%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Monday market insight!
Today the total market capitalization of cryptocurrency is around $2.64T down by about 1.07% with Fear and greed ranging within 80%- market is in Greed. Bitcoin ranges within $76688 to $78587 in the last 24 hours and is currently trading at $78231 with market dominance of 59.36%, and overall market insight is green with Bitcoin up early hours of the day. Also #ETH is currently trading at $24…
🔥 Burning alert 💯!
To celebrate the new ATH, August burnt early 🔥!
About 3500000 of $wina (0.3% of total supply worth $220) burnt into the dead address below.
0x000000000000000000000000000000034598Dead
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
https://bscscan.com/tx/0x261f7ead5415873edadcfa324134b99c395d6554cbe1640e1511110107fe520a
https://x.com/i/status/2091392326794920211
https://x.com/WinacoinDao/status/2090356364996378818?s=20
Wear your trophy 🏆!
$wina
wear their trophy not just in wallet but on their neck 🧣!
#WINA #BNB
What you HODL says a lot about you.
Winners HODL $WINA 🏆
CA: 0x23be6B07E8cd735F291F390A5FB1392bEdf6879C
#WINA #BSC #BNB
https://x.com/i/status/2089628791718990195
Spray party alert 🎤
#windotcodao ecosystem will be hosting it first spray party to celebrate $wina verification on @peniwallet.
Date: Today, 12th-Aug, 2026
Time: 8:00pm WAT
Follow the @winacoindao and @wincodao to get the code immediately it is shared.
$wina #spray #bnb
https://x.com/i/status/2087547629680894285
Monday market insight!
Today the total market capitalization of cryptocurrency is around $2.20T down by about 0.9% with Fear and greed ranging within 39%- market is in fear. Bitcoin ranges within $64436 to $65401 in the last 24 hours and is currently trading at $64501 with market dominance of 58.87%, and overall market insight is green with Bitcoin up early hours of the day. Also #ETH is currently trading at $187…
📢 OFFICIAL ANNOUNCEMENT 📢
We are pleased to announce that $WINA COIN is now officially VERIFIED ✅ on @peniwallet
Trade $wina on @peniwallet with confidence.
#BNB $WINA #PENIWALLET
https://x.com/i/status/2085365348023390335
$Wina is verified ✅ on Peniwallet 🎤
We are excited to announce that $wina is already blue ticked (verified) on @peniwallet now.
Real $wina, blue tick on peniwallet.
Ca: 0x23be6b07e8cd735f291f390a5fb1392bedf6879c
$wina #peniwallet #verificatin
https://x.com/i/status/2085316820853014596
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @windotcodao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@windotcodao named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@firescreener named in 1 post, 26 August 2026 – 26 August 2026
@winacoindao named in 1 post, 26 August 2026 – 26 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WIN.CO DAO” (@windotcodao), 318 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/windotcodao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.