Channel
@wim4u
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,271subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001422252982 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wim4u |
| Created | 16 December 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wim4u |
Recorded in 2019 as “W.I.M. 📈🏛📣” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 4,271 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 4,279 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 4,286 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 4,287 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:40 | 4,287 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
756 reactions across 17 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 169 | 22.4% | |
| 🤮 | 161 | 21.3% | |
| 😁 | 121 | 16.0% | |
| 🔥 | 76 | 10.1% | |
| 🤬 | 69 | 9.13% | |
| 🙏 | 42 | 5.56% | |
| 🤣 | 33 | 4.37% | |
| ❤ | 27 | 3.57% | |
| 🍌 | 13 | 1.72% | |
| 🙈 | 13 | 1.72% | |
| 💩 | 7 | 0.926% | |
| 🥴 | 7 | 0.926% | |
| 🤡 | 6 | 0.794% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 0.661% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 0.397% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.265% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.132% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.132% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 756reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2024 to 9 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 10 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 20 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 27 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Zeigen Sie jetzt ihr wahres Gesicht auch im Rahmen ihrer Kleidung? Göring Eckardt in #Bomberjacke, natürlich in Grün😲🫣 https://x.com/birgi2023/status/1779994961540202925?s=52&t=4NW-X9wpXDQrkcnS44UhXw
🤮96😁34🤣19❤14👍13🙈8🙏5🕊2
Wir sind ein reiches Land ;) HIER GIBTS die Auswahl an Produkten mit diesem Motiv. Textilien und mehr HIER Aktuell beliebt sind die Magneten, welche man nicht auf das Auto kleben muss, sondern wieder abnehmen kann. HIER ZUR AUSWAHL @wim4u
👍44😢2🕊1
Eine brisante Recherche des investigativen Enthüllungsjournalisten Michael Shellenberger belegt, dass „Correctiv“ und das „Institut für Strategischen Dialog“ militärische und geheimdienstliche Tarnorganisationen sind. Artikel lesen unter: https://www.anonymousnews.org/hintergruende/aufgedeckt-correctiv-ist-geheimdienstliche-tarnorganisation/ Bleiben Sie mit uns in Verbindung! Jetzt folgen via: 🔵 Telegram 🔘 Rundbr…
🤬25🔥9💯3❤2👍1
Vom Verwaltungsgericht bis zum VGH Mannheim, in Baden-Württemberg hat die Landesregierung die Justiz im Griff. Deshalb reichte es mir in meiner Klage auf Auskunft gegen den Landtag Baden-Württemberg die Absurditäten des Verwaltungsgerichts Stuttgart entgegenzunehmen. Die Exekutive und die Judikative bejubeln in Baden-Württemberg ihre Zusammenarbeit öffentlich. https://wim-zeitung.de/aufhebung-der-immunitaet-der-land…
👍21🍌3🤬3❤2🤮2👎1🤣1
https://youtu.be/0e3fHOJoMnE?si=rk6vfa54McGgwiUG
🤮24🍌4👍3❤1
Nun spricht sich herum, dass das Landgericht Halle im Glashaus sitzt. Gut, dass ich trotz schwerer gesundheitlicher Probleme und staatlicher Bedrohungen meinen Beitrag dazu geleistet habe, den Stein ins Rollen zu bringen. https://t.me/MeineDNEWS/33108, vom 15.4.2024 Vgl. https://t.me/wim4u/49460 vom 8.4.2024
🙏37😁13👍6❤3🤡2
Ausländische Agenten haben offenbar für das Ampelregime die Correctiv-Erzählungen unters Volk gebracht. Letzte Woche ritten die Polit-Darsteller der Kartellparteien im Bundestag zusätzlich auf einer angeblichen russischen Beeinflussung von AfD-Abgeordneten herum. Ganz offen, ungeniert und äußerst umfangreich ließen Scholz und Habeck auf einen ausländischen Geheimdienst verweisen, diesmal den tschechischen. Ins Zentr…
👍24🤬6💯2😁1
E-Mobilität ist Ladenhüter undhat Folgen: VW folgte seit Jahren blind der CO2-Religion, den "Klima"-irren Regierungen, der EU und der Anti-AfD-Propaganda. Und muss nun deshalb Strafen an die EU zahlen und der Pleite ins Auge sehen! Ein Desaster mit langer Ansage! ++++ ... Jetzt plärrt VW-Chef Blume ausgerechnet nach Hilfen von dem Staat, der ihn erst auf dieses dünne Eis geführt hat. Solche Figuren schimpfen sich i…
👍27🥴7🤣4❤2😁1
https://x.com/georg_pazderski/status/1779525730608505283?s=46&t=4NW-X9wpXDQrkcnS44UhXw
😁27🤣9👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wim4u. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 631,860 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WIM 📈🏛📣 Freiheit für Wirtschaft Information Meinung” (@wim4u), 4,271 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wim4u.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.