Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дикий каталог

Channel

Дикий каталог

@wildartbypolly

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

38subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002711375555
TypeChannel
Username@wildartbypolly
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/wildartbypolly

Growth

313834.57 August 2026 — 31 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31 subscribers14 August 2026 — 38 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30–39 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 19:0838+7
11 Aug 2026, 03:0031no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:3231first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
115.0%
avg views ÷ 38 subscribers
Avg views / post
43.7
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held19 (19 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total830
Reactions total22
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 03:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

22 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥940.9%
731.8%
29.09%
🦄29.09%
😁14.55%
😱14.55%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC24 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Родилась "Память дикой цивилизации" Серия "Дикие сомнения" Холст, масло 50x80см Легко и быстро родилась, и вроде чуть-чуть оставалось докрасить, сделать более гладкой, реалистичной.. Но почему-то руки не доходили. Я несколько раз пыталась решить что ну вот это законченный вид, но не покидало ощущение что она должна быть правильнее. И тем не менее 4 года(!) остается неизменной. Можно считать что время показало, что

1🔥1

9 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC24 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Была картина, мне она нравилась вроде, но чувство незаконченности присутствовало. А после внезапного вторжения нло я посмотрела на нее другим взглядом и..

😱1

9 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC77 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

А как вы выбираете? Мне кажется в картину сначала влюбляются, а потом смотрят характеристики техника/размер/цена.. Но иногда же и на конкретную стену хочется например именно большой холст или наоборот маленькую графику. Или бюджет ограничен, на подарок например. Или жанр? Это же @wildartbypolly каталог, я думаю может ввести тут хэштеги с сортировкой, вроде: #акварель #до500€ #большие #ню #коты Но какой? Что важн

9 Aug 2026, 07:38 UTC27 viewsread 11 August 2026

Вы заметили что у серии "Дикие сомнения" нет цен? Я не уверена, что хочу ее продавать. Сейчас даже не хочется думать о стоимости - это как будто окончательно зафиксирует их статус и заставит признать законченными. А я сомневаюсь. Хотя цель показа как раз перестать держать их в голове как незавершенный процесс. Так что пока серия бесценная. Пусть живут своей жизнью, хотя бы виртуальной, но кажется по-настоящему (и

8 Aug 2026, 05:03 UTC32 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

С ней самые сложные отношения 😄 Тут все сразу: и очевидно не закончена, и не такая как планировала (здесь показывала как позирую сама себе без медведя), но ни докрашивать не хочется, ни закрашивать нельзя. С зимы такое ощущение. Мне нравится сочетание цветов и я думала переделать ее в абстракцию. Я вообще на любую картину смотрю как на абстракцию, а тут это было бы логично, раз анатомия рассыпалась. Но есть что-то в

3

7 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC35 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Серия "Дикие сомнения" Ее я уже показывала, думала полежит и или я посмотрю на нее другим взглядом, или докрашу или закрашу. Но нет, вот такая она.. Я не уверена, но если верить chatgpt это "вполне состоявшаяся живописная работа, а не просто декоративная абстракция. Работает контраст: внутри — человек/тело, которое молчит; вокруг — огромное количество слов. где заканчивается один человек и начинается другой? Фон

🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC34 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Серия "Дикие сомнения" Масло и акрил на холсте 76x86см "Дикая маскировка" Название такое, потому что ai не видит там мишку (вы же видите?)! Chatgpt женскую фигуру углядел, claude анатомическое сердце с аортой и сосудами. Я считаю что любой зритель имеет право на свою интерпретацию, но считать ли их зрителями?

7 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC21 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @artbypollyVideo

Вообще если я картиной недовольна это значит: или в процессе вдохновение сделало поворот и в итоге то что на холсте не совпадает с тем, что было в голове (возможно лучше, но смириться сложно). Или - она просто еще не закончена. Ну а бывает что что-то совсем не так, такие я чаще закрашиваю, начинаю новое поверх. Но вот сейчас у меня несколько, то ли что-то между, то ли третий вариант, когда и ощущения законченности

🔥3

6 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC41 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Придумаете дикое название? Акварель на бумаге 51x36см Пока и цену можно придумать, не факт что отдам за нее, но буду иметь ввиду

31 Jul 2026, 06:20 UTC52 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

"Дикая история человека, который решил начать все сначала, но не смог найти второй носок" Акварель на бумаге 26x36см 150€

29 Jul 2026, 03:53 UTC49 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

"Дикая униформа на случай конца света" Акварель на бумаге 51x36см 200€

🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @wildartbypolly. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,013,360 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дикий каталог” (@wildartbypolly), 38 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wildartbypolly.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.