Channel
@wificallz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
22subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002002822858 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wificallz |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 18 February 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wificallz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 22 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 27 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 27 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 18 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
6 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2024 to 20 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
My current Portfolio looks like this ⚪️BASE CHAIN 🔵 $BAYC just launched , team are the strongest sounding team I’ve heard in a long time. Chart looks heavenly. Think it’s gonna send to VALHALLAH https://dexscreener.com/base/0x687Bb2a066E841E4058abc28D724b5a2EeD1410a $DEFIDO They just finished minting all their NFTS a few hours ago , I've grabbed a couple as well as aped into the coin. Team seems solid. NFT fund…
BASE SEASON
Gm fam
Gn fam good day of trading today , bull season is here 🚀
❤2
1M mc LFG , hope you held $BRATT🚀
$BRATT CALLED AT 200k now at 645 , new meta seems to be accepted , SENDDD🚀
$BRATT 💎Son of Brett , going off the BRETT meta of recent Brett did numbers so let’s see if like farther like son…😎 Super early only 2 hours old 🔥🚀could send ✅ Sat at 200k mc 📈 Website looks good 🌎 I’ve aped a bag 👀 DYOR NFA https://t.me/sonofbrett https://dexscreener.com/base/0x9D53d1C04DC21F92b21e5a58bDc87D52e0973557
$INT hit $637 a coin 🚀, now it’s $294 per integer. Nice little dip if anyone was thinking about grabbing some for cheap 👀
I’ve aped a long term bag on this one we are early I think 👀👀
❤2
$INT ✅Integer is a new deflationary token where the price can only go up in Integers, you can only buy whole coins. And there’s some “teleport” system with burns 🔥🔥 Seems like an exciting time on 🔵base⚪️ chain📈 Check out Integer/WETH on DEX Screener! https://dexscreener.com/base/0x75AecdEE325443441EAA8b2d159fcAA4d851C57e https://t.me/integerINT
❤2
It’s Devs vs investors it feels like at the moment , can’t trust anyone
Man what is up with Sol !
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @wificallz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wifi Calls” (@wificallz), 22 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wificallz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.