Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

˚꩜⋆.wiewsoy✧ೃ

@wiewsoy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

192subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002242747176
TypeChannel
Username@wiewsoy
Descriptionприветики я вивсой можете обращаться ко мне на ты прайс - https://wiwaprice.carrd.co/ если есть вопросы пишите @wiewsoya
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/wiewsoy

Growth

19210 Aug 2026, 15:31 — 192 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 15:45 — 192 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 15:3110 Aug 2026, 15:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 191–193 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 15:45192no change
10 Aug 2026, 15:31192first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
59.2%
avg views ÷ 192 subscribers
Avg views / post
114
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
21.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held14 (23 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total1,591
Reactions total342
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
309
Videos
5
Links
16

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
22s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

342 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 58098516448331746939728.4%
custom 53890148320223124809026.3%
custom 53976171704798659244312.6%
custom 52246641202797335273811.1%
custom 52966314298101330673510.2%
custom 5361666318527387197298.48%
custom 5400352033855265573102.92%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 342reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC41 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🌟 стало тесновато в рамках собственного стиля, поэтому 🌟 попробовала что-то новенькое с уклоном в акварельность, 🌟 мыльность, полупрозрачность, намёк на традишность - то 🌟 есть полная противоположность того, что я обычно рисую дайте шуму епта🦮

custom 580985164483317469313custom 53890148320223124806custom 53616663185273871974

7 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC70 views28 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ///𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑝𝑡

custom 538901483202231248016custom 52966314298101330678custom 52246641202797335274

4 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC112 views30 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

давно не тыкала палкой лор своих кошачьих девочек, балюсь ориджем🦄💄 постами выше кадры отдельно, т.к. телега нещадно пожрала качество видика

custom 580985164483317469317custom 53976171704798659247custom 53616663185273871976

4 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC97 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 580985164483317469314custom 52246641202797335274custom 54003520338552655731

4 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC87 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 580985164483317469313custom 53890148320223124808

3 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC95 views29 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

за практически год так и не смогла от них избавиться!!! хочетс уже хоть как-то их сплавить кокетливо напоминаю о их существовании и предлагаю вам сделку: приобрести сладких крохотулек можно по 1500деняк (каждая отдельно)☺️ на первой бронь! пишите если ваше сердечко екнуло - @wiewsoya

custom 522466412027973352712custom 53890148320223124808custom 53976171704798659248custom 52966314298101330671

3 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC99 views29 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🫀🫀🫀🫀🫀🫀🫀🫀🫀🫀🫀🫀🫀🫀 несколько дней подряд аутировала калякала лошадок на планшете не вставала с кровати. ПРЕДСТАВЬТЕ С НИМИ НАКЛЕЙКИ???,,, ИЛИ ГАЧА БРЕЛОКИ???.......оооо....☺️ 🫀🫀🫀🫀🫀🫀🫀🫀🫀🫀🫀🫀🫀🫀

custom 539761717047986592414custom 580985164483317469311custom 53616663185273871972custom 53890148320223124802

2 Aug 2026, 05:27 UTC95 views29 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

обнова которую вы заслужили торжественно вхожу в пони фазу.🇺🇸🍑

custom 529663142981013306716custom 53976171704798659247custom 58098516448331746936

29 Jul 2026, 09:28 UTC157 views33 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩 𝕰𝕸𝕺 𝕱𝕷𝖀𝕿𝕿𝕰𝕽𝕾𝕳𝖄 🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟

custom 538901483202231248016custom 580985164483317469310custom 53616663185273871977

26 Jul 2026, 10:46 UTC166 views34 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

୨ 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓸𝓷 ৎ 🩷🩷🩷🩷 🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷отмучала последний заказ с этим 🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷пареньком😼 🩷🩷 наконец можно выдохнуть!

custom 538901483202231248020custom 53976171704798659247custom 58098516448331746937

24 Jul 2026, 15:51 UTC135 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @sweetdekejePhoto

the bluetooth device is connected successfully бебе и заза 👽👽 ответка для любими

custom 53890148320223124809custom 52966314298101330673custom 58098516448331746933

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @wiewsoy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 221,308 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“˚꩜⋆.wiewsoy✧ೃ” (@wiewsoy), 192 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wiewsoy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.