Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Листи Примарного Автора

@widluda

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

548subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001943065237
TypeChannel
Username@widluda
DescriptionТворчий канал, українського автора, який розповідає про фентезі, історію та різні штуки з творчої кухні. Зараз працюю над своєю другою книго,"дзвінкий меч, гостре перо". Буду радий, якщо ви завітаєте. https://www.threads.com/@mishakosiuk?igshid=NTc4
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/widluda

Growth

5485505496 Aug 2026, 10:53 — 550 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 13:21 — 548 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:18 — 548 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 10:536 Aug 2026, 18:18
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 548–550 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 18:18548no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:21548-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:53550first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.1%
avg views ÷ 548 subscribers
Avg views / post
110
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held14 (5 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,541
Reactions total101
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,060
Videos
70
Links
380

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

101 reactions across 12 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2625.7%
😢2019.8%
🤣1110.9%
98.91%
😭98.91%
🔥87.92%
🌚54.95%
😱43.96%
💯32.97%
💩21.98%
🖕21.98%
😁10.99%
🤡10.99%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC17 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Чому шлях меча несумісний із корпоративізмом Колись фехтування було однією з тих речей, заради яких люди йшли в кіно. Принцеса-Наречена, приквели Зоряних Воєн, Потоп, Маска Зорро — багато з цих та інших фільмів і досі обговорюються та шануються. Та й не дивно: людям завжди було цікаво дивитися на питки та казні, як казав Митець, а якщо вони ще й красиво поставлені, так взагалі. Але йшов час, технології розвивалися,

1👍1💯1

6 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC63 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

По перше, ми достроково припиняємо пости хейт спітча. Це було цікаво на себе приміряти, але, якщо чесно, крім Одіссеї Нолана, я нічого особливого не хотів поливати брудом. Так, навіть Колесо часу. Якщо щось мені не подобається, я з цим не контактую, без крайньої потреби. Краще говорити про щось що хороше, або суперечливе. Життя надто коротке, щоб жити ненавистю. Тому під кінець тижня, і на наступний, краще розповім

🔥7👍1

Signed Міша Косюк

6 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC102 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

-1. Сумно.

😭8🌚4

Signed Міша Косюк

6 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC94 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Як вестоід бачить середньовіччя. Колесо часу- це погане фентезі, якому пощастило. Більшість книг з частиною недоліків, які має цикл, були б розкритиковані і не видані. Це просто риф, серед океану, в який іноді врізається якийсь корабель. От говорю про це, і вже відчуваю, як я перетворююсь на титан, класу Коваль образ( привіт Пертурабо) Я не прочитав увесь цикл, але шоста книга спричинила в мені нечитуна, який я дос

👍4

Signed Міша Косюк

6 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC108 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Додатки для навчання хрінь. Як не крути. #творчість @widluda

🤣11

Signed Міша Косюк

6 Aug 2026, 07:20 UTC114 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

На жаль, не канонічно. #Warhammer_fantasy @widluda

😢6

Signed Міша Косюк

6 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC116 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ранку всім роботягам Цей мем бреше. Ніхто не пише роботягам. #творчість @widluda

👍9💯2😁1😭1

Signed Міша Косюк

5 Aug 2026, 19:54 UTC145 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

мда, -1

😱4🌚1👍1

Signed Міша Косюк

5 Aug 2026, 19:34 UTC147 viewsread 6 August 2026

ну і не забувайте, що ви можете мені допомогти поширюючи це. ну і пишіть, якщо я чимось можу вам допомогти

Signed Міша Косюк

5 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC150 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Дітько. Я досі намагаюся видавити з себе хоча б пару слів. Зараз буду мучити себе, з усіх сил. Набридло це стоялово. Я мушу дописати другу книгу до кінця року. Я маю як мінімум собі доказати, що я можу це зробити. Хе, може навіть друга книга буде кращою за першу. Але ми це побачимо пізніше. Поки я просто хочу не стояти на місці. Усім надобраніч. #творчість @widluda

5👍2🔥1

Signed Міша Косюк

5 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC146 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Творча сліпота. Екранізація чи адаптація чогось, це завжди є своєрідним тестом. Наскільки хтось розумієте чи поважаєте першоджерело, має свій погляд на нього, чи здатен в ступити а діалог з твором. Адаптація навіть може не відповідати тому, що було і творі, але добре передавати ідею та образи оригіналу. Одіссея Нолага - це дуже суперечливий фільм. По перше, суперечлива ситуація навколо нього. При всій критиці, яка

👍83💩2🖕2🤡1

Signed Міша Косюк

5 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC109 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @WarhammerUkrainePhoto

Внаслідок атаки росії на логістичний центр RNK-Ranok 1 серпня у вогні було знищено усі наклади романів «Магос» й «Незліченний та Провісник». Про це повідомили Varvar Publishing. На щастя, це не означає, що знищено всі копії, адже певна (хай менша) кількість лишилася на інших складах і книгарнях. Засновник видавництва Артем Варгаліонок у Threads написав: «Друзі, у нас багато питають про книжки яких або залишилось 40-

😢7

Signed Міша Косюк

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @widluda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 719,556 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Листи Примарного Автора” (@widluda), 548 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/widluda.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.