Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Wiaomingu Arts (18+)

Channel

Wiaomingu Arts (18+)

@wiaarts

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

145subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002509977624
TypeChannel
Username@wiaarts
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded2 September 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/wiaarts

Growth

1411451431 September 2026 — 141 subscribers2 September 2026 — 141 subscribers2 September 2026 — 142 subscribers11 September 2026 — 145 subscribers1 September 202611 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 140–146 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 04:37145+3
2 Sept 2026, 08:24142+1
2 Sept 2026, 00:00141no change
1 Sept 2026, 23:45141first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 28 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
60.8%
avg views ÷ 145 subscribers
Avg views / post
88.2
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held13 (28 March 20261 September 2026)
Views total441
Reactions total50
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 00:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

308 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15349.7%
❤‍🔥4614.9%
😍3812.3%
🔥3611.7%
🍾82.60%
👍72.27%
😘61.95%
🤩61.95%
😭41.30%
👀20.649%
💘20.649%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 308 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
25
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 13 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
21
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wiaarts. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 March 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 14:09 UTC66 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

И отдельно моя часть скетчевой Ауриэльки с фоном от https://t.me/jinxpowerx_art☺️ Получилось так ярко и необычно для меня :3 #FreeArt #RenderedSketch

😍8❤‍🔥1

1 Sept 2026, 14:08 UTC28 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @qoofoartPhoto

✨ ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ мы снова собрались нашей скромной группкой, чтобы замутить коллаб в честь начала учебного года всем школьникам - сочувствую, всем работягам - соболезную, остальные молодцы, кайфуйте дальше ✨ вот они слева направо (ну почти) ✨ 📌 Пожарник 📌 Chui 📌 JinxPowerX (фоновик) 📌 Мандаринка 📌 Мифти 📌 mw 📌 kokkare 📌 sega 📌 qoofo 📌 Bunya 📌 MEYO 📌 Wiaomingu (помощь с фоном) 📌 ERMANG 📌 Тюления 📌 Тюлень 📌 Эщкере-Тюлень

7❤‍🔥1🔥1

27 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC98 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @qoofoartPhoto

я не умер, два готовых арта ждут свой черед (один будет 1 сентября, второй хз, но тоже где то в сентябре), ну и я просто немного в артблочинске 🫠 устал от стиля, в котором рисую, устал от "техники", если ее можно так назвать, в которой рисую. хочется пробовать новое, хочется учиться новому, хочется кайфовать от работ, понимаете? в общем решил поскетчить, но выключив голову вообще, вот как рисовалось, так и рисовал,

😍63👍2

18 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC164 views21 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026

Posted without readable text

❤‍🔥8🔥5😭42👀2

6 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC224 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Ребятки, хотите, чтобы разные спойлеры и почеркушки, которые обычно не выкладываются, публиковались здесь за звёздочки?

  1. Пусть будет62%
  2. Не15%
  3. Без разницы32%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

😍1

30 Jul 2026, 14:45 UTC285 views39 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Внезапный ужин☺️ #Commissions #Outline

20❤‍🔥9🔥7🍾3

17 Jun 2026, 12:21 UTC456 views43 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

И вот такая яркая зайка получилась 😏 #Commissions #Fullart

21❤‍🔥13😍6😘3

17 Jun 2026, 12:18 UTC≈1,430 views28 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Этапы на девочку, которую делала последние недели :3 #Commissions #Outline #FlatColor #RenderedSketch #ColorBandW

14😍7❤‍🔥6😘1

31 May 2026, 11:18 UTC456 views45 reactions21 Starsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Закончила, наконец, эту красоту :3 #Commissions #Fullart

25🔥10👍5😍3😘2

25 Apr 2026, 12:25 UTC587 views30 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Photo

#Commissions #Outline увидите меня в следующем году 🤣

18❤‍🔥8😍3🔥1

5 Apr 2026, 13:13 UTC708 views39 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Photo

Пришла идея поменять композицию, когда арт был почти закончен😂 И вот такой итог получился :3 #Commissions #Fullart

23🔥11🍾5

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @wiaarts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTCAnonymous Poll34 voters

Ребятки, хотите, чтобы разные спойлеры и почеркушки, которые обычно не выкладываются, публиковались здесь за звёздочки?

  1. Пусть будет62%
  2. Не15%
  3. Без разницы32%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Wiaomingu Arts (18+)” (@wiaarts), 145 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wiaarts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.