Sticker, posted without a caption
![Telegram profile photo for чому [перенесено]](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/d5/d5205b7abac86ae3688dae27cad8b614dfc5868374f27a0ff0d290d329c62db5.jpg)
Channel
чому [перенесено]
@whyissl
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
34subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001784143819 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @whyissl |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 5 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/whyissl |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 34 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 35 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
115 reactions across 17 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💋 | 17 | 14.8% | |
| 🤡 | 12 | 10.4% | |
| 🍓 | 9 | 7.83% | |
| 🖕 | 8 | 6.96% | |
| 🤔 | 8 | 6.96% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 6.96% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 6.09% | |
| 😭 | 7 | 6.09% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 4.35% | |
| 🍌 | 4 | 3.48% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 2.61% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 2.61% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 2.61% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 2.61% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 1.74% | |
| 🎅 | 2 | 1.74% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.74% | |
| 👻 | 2 | 1.74% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 1.74% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.87% | |
| 7 further kinds | 7 | 6.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 October 2023 to 27 December 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
підписуйтесь на @whyissll
Channel name was changed to «чому [перенесено]»
🍙 | привіт, на жаль цей проєкт потрібно перенести на інший канал, по технічних причинах, тому підписуйтесь будь ласка –> @whyissll
😭7🤡3❤🔥2💋2💩1🤮1🙏1
я хочу плакати, але не можу?
💋2❤1
всі так бояться цього дня зізнань? мені або все одно, або навпаки мило почитати, що там люди пишуть
💋2
нікого не цікавить, якщо я просуну свій канал, а ви станете адміном до 50≈ підписників, то в майбутньому отримаєте долю з реклами? @seasonvibef
🔥2💋1🤔1
я не можу знайти гелп по наліпкам, по всім фд, де є набір у адміни? напишіть мені в оп, якщо цікавить - @kdxlw[ви]🫶🏻
⚡1💋1
деякі власники кф не бачать що у людей є росняве в профилі, та просто приймають їх.
🥰2💋1
я хочу спати
⚡1❤1💋1💘1
вона це робить? Я ненавиджу коли моя мати п'є алкоголь, вона стає неврівноважиною постоянно кричить на мене і каже наскільки їй було добре б без мене та моїх братів. Вона в цьому стане не розуміє слово "ні" "не хочу" у неї своя думка та бачення ситуації. Як добре, що у неї цей стане рідко, а то я ледве витримую її звичайну, а тут це
🥰4💔3❤2
так мало людей говорять про tripleS?😭😭😭
🤔3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @whyissl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@whyissl named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“чому [перенесено]” (@whyissl), 34 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whyissl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.