Channel
@why_not_pro_psy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
321subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001495187475 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @why_not_pro_psy |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/why_not_pro_psy |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 321 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 320 | -4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 08:58 | 324 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:20 | 325 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:21 | 325 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
44 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 40 | 90.9% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 6.82% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Про огурцы и планирование У меня на подоконнике растут огурцы. И они похожи на меня. Не обращая внимания на неблагоприятные условия, продолжают цвести и даже расти. Всё в моей жизни происходит на интересе, это моя движущая сила. Есть интерес- есть импульс к действиям. Иногда этот импульс я реализую сама. Иногда есть внешние помощники, обстоятельства, люди и их интерес. Чаще всего это такая синергия. Так вот, с ог…
❤11
О планах позже. Сегодня хочу порекомендовать фильм, основанный на реальных событиях. На первый взгляд незамысловатый сюжет, но я увидела в этой истории себя. Возможно, поэтому он меня и тронул. «Мечтать не вредно», 2026
❤13
Интересная у нас беседа получилась👌🏻 И тут помогут ответы на вопросы: ? могу ли я найти новый интерес в своей работе ? могу ли я найти более интересную работу ? чего хочет та часть меня, для которой работа неинтересное обязательство (качественного отдыха/ меньше нагрузки/ больше денег/ признания и пр) и как я могу себе это организовать не за счет работы !! Работа часто именно обязательство, но перед кем- уточните у…
❤5
Про фестиваль здесь https://academy.psi-ddt.ru/festival_reg
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤1
1 день месяца. Вы планируете время? Если да- как? Тема возникла, благодаря комментариям. Поясню свое видение голосом👇🏻
Август, привет🦋 А с ним череда дней рождения и большие планы как и в любой другой месяц Но сначала итоги июля в картинках. И очевидное- я много гуляла, часто не одна, достаточно и разнообразно отдыхала. Планирую продолжить) Что у вас?
❤8
Вот это самое неприятное, что может произойти в работе на себя- когда все смешалось и конца не видно, и удовлетворения ноль 🤷♀️👇🏻👇🏻
❤2
Оно так точно не работает. Моя коллега живёт на даче, взяла клиентов вести. А потом говорит и домашние дела и клиенты всё смешалось и вроде растянуто, но это нескончаемо
Говорить мне удобнее, чем писать, поэтому решила собирать ваши вопросы и отвечать на них голосом. Что-то типа коротких подкастов. Учитывая, что телеграм дает возможность прямо в канале распаковать аудио в текст, это будет удобно и тем, кто читает, а не слушает. У меня тут есть закрепленное место для вопросов- пишите. Если что-то очень личное, пишите в анонимный бот
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥1
Voice message, posted without a caption
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @why_not_pro_psy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Почему нет🤔” (@why_not_pro_psy), 321 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/why_not_pro_psy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.