Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Who said it was Hard!?

Channel

Who said it was Hard!?

@whosaiditwashard

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

353subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002182280004
TypeChannel
Username@whosaiditwashard
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded31 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/whosaiditwashard

Growth

34935335131 August 2026 — 350 subscribers1 September 2026 — 349 subscribers18 September 2026 — 353 subscribers31 August 202618 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 18 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 348–354 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 00:18353+4
1 Sept 2026, 05:16349-1
31 Aug 2026, 09:45350first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1191.7%
👍18.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 October 2024 to 6 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 May 2026, 23:58 UTC323 views1 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Forwarded from @LeenaNotes4Med

هذا الكتاب

1

6 May 2026, 23:58 UTC212 viewsread 31 August 2026

#ImpFilesLinks - B20 Clinical google drive https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1LWSI6ZTGeesdctYWEz0Xoha1krabMvP4 - Clinical Exam Files + Uworld Qbank + Recordings https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1KNPMieHNQ1RxH6PVpuJdMcCSQK1h1bXZ?usp=drive_link - Study With Us Notion https://studywithus.notion.site/clinical-years-57b413d2bdd7476a9913b0a2eed54c09 - Study With Us google drive https://drive.google.com/d

6 May 2026, 23:58 UTC406 views0 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Forwarded from @LeenaNotes4MedPhoto

خلصنا فاميلي ما سويت شي زياده الصراحه يمكن قريت كم شي من هالكتاب

6 May 2026, 23:58 UTC401 views1 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Forwarded from @LeenaNotes4Med

الفاملي احلى بلوك والله واكثر بلوك تذاكرونه برواااق ولا تشيلون همه ابدًا مافيه مصادر كثيره هي كذا: ١- نوشن ٢- اشوف اخر القايد لاينز الي قالوا عنها الدكاتره ٣- ملخصاتي اقروا نوشن وافهموه وادخلوا ملخصاتي باذن الله شامل الي تحتاجونه

1

6 May 2026, 23:58 UTC307 viewsread 31 August 2026
Forwarded from @LeenaNotes4Med

طبعا نوشن موجود فيه اهم الاشياء من الكتاب وغيره من المراجع شيكوا عليهم اهمم شي

6 May 2026, 23:58 UTC289 viewsread 31 August 2026
Forwarded from @LeenaNotes4MedPhoto

ذاكرت من : 1- Study with us (notion) 2- ملخصاتي و ملخصات ثانيه برسلهم مره حلوين وشاملين باذذن الله وهذا الكتاب: كنت اول شي اقرا الكتاب (مو دايم) او اقرا من نوشن وافهم الموضوع. ثم اذاكر من ملخصي الي كان based on them and other resources او من ملخصات ثانيه لقيتها حلوه

6 May 2026, 23:58 UTC225 viewsread 31 August 2026
Forwarded from @LeenaNotes4Med

مصادر البيديا الي اعتمدتها كانت Manily : Study with us (notion) and (Telegram) كان كافي جدًا بالنسبة لي ، وما احتجت اعاني بالمصادر وادور كل شي كان متكامل. اللكتشرز الصراحه كنت احطها بتشات جبت يلخص لي وما احب اذاكر منها.

6 May 2026, 23:58 UTC203 viewsread 31 August 2026
Forwarded from @LeenaNotes4Med

هنا اهم الروابط الي تستمرون معها لاخر سنه باذن الله.

6 May 2026, 23:58 UTC205 viewsread 31 August 2026
Forwarded from @LeenaNotes4Med

جاهزين لملخصات الكلنكال ؟

6 May 2026, 23:58 UTC225 views1 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Forwarded from @LeenaNotes4Med

تمام الوضع بالكلنكال يختلف ، مافيه سلايدز. الي سويته هو اني كنت اسوي ملخصات وجداول، اخذ من هنا وشوي من هنا ومختلف المصادر وبمساعده تشات جبت يرتبهم لي، وارجع ارتب وراه واكتب وهكذا، واضيف من التجميعات. بالاخير اطلع بملف ممتاز يشمل اغلب المهم واحيانًا كل المهم. بعدها كنت اطبع اول باول كل موضوع او كل ما اذاكر موضوع اطبعه واذاكر منه قدام عيوني واشخبط واخطط واكتب نوتس وغيره، واخر البلوك اسلّكهم بالمكتبه عشان يصير مرجع لي م

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @whosaiditwashard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ninja Nerd Videos & Notes 2026
@NinjaNerd770 · 38,849
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Who said it was Hard!?” (@whosaiditwashard), 353 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whosaiditwashard.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.