Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Who’s Who

Channel

Who’s Who

@whoiswho_club

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001719020259
TypeChannel
Username@whoiswho_club
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged4 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/whoiswho_club

Growth

101110.58 August 2026 — 11 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10 subscribers8 August 202624 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 15 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10–11 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 05:5610-1
12 Aug 2026, 07:1611no change
8 Aug 2026, 22:1711first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
42s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

81 reactions across 17 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 60372625095246514291417.3%
custom 60351422516743415051113.6%
custom 58751935034530238631012.3%
custom 519751813167267978189.88%
custom 578265853613991907589.88%
custom 603763201844602812178.64%
custom 537310901334707492156.17%
custom 519512917207840022133.70%
custom 519729645982059988133.70%
custom 578533582547871734433.70%
custom 519736026155978312522.47%
custom 519738619457231044822.47%
custom 538857726934413807122.47%
custom 531241565366626330911.23%
custom 531252061837200849211.23%
custom 537556152127746941511.23%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2025 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
14
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @whoiswho_club. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 December 2025 to 17 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Jul 2026, 15:40 UTC209 views4 reactions14 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Who’s Who — Первая встреча M&M. by me Prod. by me Rec. by me Art. by Soika & me Animation. by me label: Who’s Who Club Скачать / Слушать: https://band.link/the_first_meeting

custom 53731090133470749212custom 53125206183720084921custom 53885772693441380711

Signed Who's Who

2 Jul 2026, 13:38 UTC101 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Who’s Who — Разбуди меня по краю глубокого озера (Delux) M&M. by me Prod. by flamedead Rec. by вайджи & me Art. by Soi & me Animation. by me label: Who’s Who Club Скачать / Слушать: https://band.link/deep_lake_deluxe

custom 53731090133470749212custom 53755615212774694151custom 53885772693441380711

Signed Who's Who

15 Jun 2026, 19:12 UTC70 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Отгружаем «Мотылёк» на все площадки! Ловите обложку от Soika 🦋

Signed Who's Who

6 Jun 2026, 21:12 UTC86 viewsread 12 August 2026

Добавили текст трека на Genius!

Signed Who's Who

4 Jun 2026, 16:18 UTC80 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Who’s Who — Разбуди меня по краю глубокого озера M&M. by me Prod. by flamedead Rec. by вайджи Art. by Soi Animation. by me label: Who’s Who Club Скачать / Слушать: https://band.link/deep_lake

custom 53124156536662633091custom 53731090133470749211

Signed Who's Who

26 Mar 2026, 15:05 UTC467 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Who’s Who — Dirty Karina M&M. by вайджи & me Prod. by bb bless Rec. by WhyStudio. Art. by Soi Animation. by Soi & me label: Who’s Who Club Скачать / Слушать: https://band.link/dirty_karina

custom 51951291720784002213custom 51973861945723104482custom 51972964598205998811

Signed Who's Who

20 Mar 2026, 07:43 UTC152 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Че как вам анимация? Ставьте свои реакции 🌺

custom 51975181316726797818custom 51972964598205998812custom 51973602615597831252

7 Jan 2026, 18:20 UTC218 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 57853358254787173442

23 Dec 2025, 15:50 UTC168 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 57826585361399190752

13 Dec 2025, 00:02 UTC150 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Забрали плейлист в Яндекс Музыке!!!

custom 57826585361399190753custom 58751935034530238632custom 60372625095246514291

12 Dec 2025, 10:45 UTC140 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Обновил для вас линк на новый трек «Искренний», слушайте с кайфом на всех площадках. Хочу сказать большое спасибо всем, кто принял участие в работе над треком. Каждый день вижу вашу отдачу и хочется выпускать все больше и больше материала!

custom 58751935034530238632

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @whoiswho_club. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Who’s Who” (@whoiswho_club), 10 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whoiswho_club.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.