2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40–42 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 18:15
41
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:22
41
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 10 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
490.2%
avg views ÷ 41 subscribers
Avg views / post
201
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 July 2026
Posts held
16 (10 September 2025 – 16 July 2026)
Views total
201
Reactions total
4
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
37
Videos
11
Links
29
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
37s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
98 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
49
50.0%
✍
19
19.4%
custom 5463156670609768068
14
14.3%
custom 5971844776012551840
7
7.14%
😁
5
5.10%
😢
4
4.08%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 98reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2025 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 16 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @whocencer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 September 2025 to 16 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Пишем бесплатное сообщение Павлу Дурову
Как вы все знаете, сообщения @monk стоят дорого и не все могут себе их позволить. Но есть такой популярный ИИ-агент @mira, одна из фич которого позволяет писать анонимные сообщения любому пользователю, если он хотя бы один раз запускал бота. В том числе и Дурову.
Обращение к разработчикам Mira
Я вообще не понимаю, как вы допустили эту фичу в прод без возможности настроек прив…
Немного о принятии решений
Недавно наткнулся на интересный принцип принятия решений. Изначально он был придуман Джеффом Безосом в Amazon для борьбы с бюрократией внутри компании чтобы ускорить процесс принятия решений. Но он также прекрасно ложится и под философию жизни и нравится мне тем, что меняет фокус с правильности решения на цену ошибки и возможность «отката».
Много людей иногда придают простым решениям слиш…
"Самый крупный IPO в истории"
Уже послезавтра SpaceX выходит на IPO (тикер – SPCX). Компания планирует привлечь рекордные $75 млрд инвестиций при общей оценке компании в $1.75 трлн. Стоимость одной акции составит примерно $135.
И если вы думаете, что эти деньги пойдут на ракеты, космос и Марс – вы частично правы.
Судя по документу, привлечённые деньги будут направлены на:
• AI-инфраструктуру
• Космос, Ракеты, Star…
6 японских техник, которые стоит внедрить в свою жизнь.
1) Кайдзен. Маленькие шаги делают большие изменения.
Фокусируйся на том, чтобы каждый день стать на 1% лучше. Маленькие победы накапливаются со временем.
2) Синрин-йоку. Природа исцеляет.
Оставь все гаджеты и выйди на природу. Максимально замедлись, и наслаждайся моментом. Задействуй 4 чувства:
· Зрение: Солнце, растения, деревья, животные.
· Слух: Пение птиц,…
1-2 Мая 2026 года в Дубае состоится ежегодная конференция TON Gateway. Билеты уже в продаже, но посмотреть сколько всего мест осталось и сколько участников будет на конфе — нельзя.
В одном из каналов я подметил, что эту информацию можно достать, и быстро на коленке написал небольшого бота, чтобы кто хочет, но не решается или откладывает решение с покупкой билета (или ещё зачем-то) — мог отслеживать, сколько людей ку…
🎄 Мой первый проект, полностью сделанный с помощью вайб-кодинга за два дня.
Использовал ChatGPT и Gemini, на практике выяснил, что Gemini пишет код заметно аккуратнее и лучше.
По механикам пока сыровато, сейчас кроме салютов, музыки и бросания снежков ничего особо нет. Так что пишите свои идеи в комментариях — самые интересные добавлю в игру.
Заценить можно здесь (работает только на компьютерах)
Если маленький фпс…
Получил бан в чате Telegram Contests за критику подарков. Это уже свобода слова?
Текст сообщения:
They need more designers to draw and produce more shitty gifts.
💎 Fragment SDK
Ранее я упоминал, что разработал API для Fragment. Я думал, что простого RESTful достаточно, но позже понял, что нужен более гибкий и универсальный инструмент. Так родилась идея создать fragment-sdk — первый удобный Python клиент с открытым исходным кодом.
Теперь вам не нужно кидать свои куки и seed-фразы кошельков в закрытые API или непонятные скрипты с форумов. Всё уже сделано за вас — просто устан…
Октябрь не активничал, был просто в статусе пассивного наблюдателя. Коротко:
11 числа мне удалось вживую понаблюдать за падением рынка крипты и акций. Отлично зашло вместо кино.
23 числа мне удалось немного подзаработать на падении рынка в кс.
И возвращаюсь я тоже не с пустыми руками, а с новыми идеями.
Первое.
Я разработал новый опенсорс проект — готовый сервис для покупки Telegram Stars через Fragment. Есть сразу …
Красивые слова написал PD в свой день рождения: У нас заканчивается время, надо бороться за свободу.
Интернет больше не территория свободы — и не потому, что его «захватили» злые правительства, а потому, что люди добровольно отдали приватность в обмен на удобство. Мы добровольно позволили следить за собой, когда подписали все пользовательские соглашения и выдали разрешения приложениям и сайтам, которыми пользуемся.
…
❤7
Signed Deniel
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @whocencer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@whocencer named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@pidorasss named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@tonzo_test_bot named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“винчестер.” (@whocencer), 41 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whocencer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
