Channel
@whataboutsobi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
836subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001128917084 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @whataboutsobi |
| Description | 🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️ Запрещено для просмотра и ознакомления |
| Created | 8 July 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/whataboutsobi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 836 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:32 | 836 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (10 June 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,046 |
| Reactions total | 117 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
302 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 187 | 61.9% | |
| 🔥 | 68 | 22.5% | |
| 🤬 | 33 | 10.9% | |
| 👀 | 14 | 4.64% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 302reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я всё ещё не могу поверить, что он это сказал. И каждый раз смотря видео, где россияне отвечают ему на эту ухмылку, задаюсь вопросом: Как глава страны может такое сказать?! Решения его правительства довели страну до стольких кризисов, что и пальцев на руках не хватит. Он вторгся на территорию соседей, которые всегда были частью наших семей. Ну у кого в Украине нет друзей или родственников? И теперь, он делает вид, ч…
❤16👀3🤬1
Если карабины, то только такие! 💜💜💜
🔥23❤8👀2
Video, posted without a caption
❤6
Posted without readable text
🤬14👀3
Вчера в шествие берлинского Прайда въехала машина. Сейчас проводится расследование и пока никаких официальных заявлений и мотивов мы не знаем. Но что важно!? Мероприятия для квиров продолжают подвергаться нападениям. При этом не важно в какой стране вы живёте. Не смотря на полицейских, которые всегда сопровождают прайды (с той или другой стороны), такие инциденты всё равно происходят. Да, ещё никто не заявил о реал…
🤬18❤8
Мне самой в 19 поставили диагноз СПКЯ (теперь ПМОС) и это сильно повлияло на восприятие своего тела и гендера! До 19 у меня не было месячных, и потом они начались только благодаря гормональной терапии. Через несколько лет другая гинекологиня сказала, что у меня всё в порядке с яичниками и поэтому не может быть у меня СПКЯ. Но теперь эндокринологи, наконец, договорились, что дело не в самих яичниках и что весь организ…
❤9
Недавно «Гласная» выпустила статью о женщинах с двумя матками. Героини рассказывали, что годами не могли добиться диагноза, сталкивались с недоверием врачей или узнавали о своей особенности случайно. Такие истории обычно объясняют тем, что медицина плохо изучала женское здоровье. Это правда, но за этим стоит еще одна вещь — представление о том, что существует одно «правильное» женское тело. Огромное количество тел а…
❤4
Добавлю только, что СПКЯ теперь называется ПМОС (подробности можно почитать в интернете, например тут)
❤2
Читаю ваши ответы и улыбаюсь, потому что вижу отклик на мою идею! Мне, как фанату подкаст-медиа, тоже не хватает простых историй, без пафоса и мононормативности. Я тоже вижу, что все (без преувеличения) существующие подкасты о квирах на русском языке сосредоточены на гомосексуальных людях. И мне не интересно их слушать, потому что они не отражают мой опыт или даже вычеркивают его. Спасибо вам за откровенность и вов…
🔥12
Не смотря на то, что ночью было прохладно и мы спали с открытыми окнами впервые за неделю, спалось мне не очень хорошо. Потому что я нервный пирожочек, который сегодня идёт на пробный день в цветочный магазин. И поэтому поводу я на себя сильно давлю. Просто надоело получать отказы по работе и чувствовать себя зависимой от пособия и Макса. На прошлой сессии с психологом, мы обсуждали моё решение уйти из университета …
❤22🔥6
📝 Запускаем службу юридической помощи С сегодняшнего дня мы консультируем и по юридическим вопросам: помогаем разобраться в конкретной ситуации, подготовить документы, составить жалобу или иск. При необходимости мы также можем предоставить юридическое заключение для судов и международных органов. В каких ситуациях обращаться: ▪️признание однополых союзов в ЕС; ▪️транснациональные репрессии; ▪️задержки с получени…
Знаете, что меня грустит? Тот факт, что у би-сообщества всё ещё нет подкастов на русском. Каждый раз, когда я вижу очередной пример бифобии, мне очень хочется поговорить о нём. Когда именитые активистки ведут себя бифобно, когда нас в очередной раз стирают из ЛГБТ-мероприятий и исследований. Внутри меня всё просится разложить по полочкам и позанудничать над каждым аспектом жизни немоносексуальных людей. Уже несколь…
❤14🔥5👀4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @whataboutsobi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 502,232 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“What about Sobi?🦄✨” (@whataboutsobi), 836 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whataboutsobi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.