Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for В гостях у Лисы (14+)

Channel

В гостях у Лисы (14+)

@whaha_itsmeagain

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

38subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001879943699
TypeChannel
Username@whaha_itsmeagain
DescriptionКу! Я владелец канала ага оке угу Меня зовут Лиса и добро пожаловать :D
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/whaha_itsmeagain

Growth

389 Aug 2026, 20:32 — 38 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 20:47 — 38 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 20:3210 Aug 2026, 20:47
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37–39 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 20:4738no change
9 Aug 2026, 20:3238first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
83.0%
avg views ÷ 38 subscribers
Avg views / post
31.5
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
31.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held13 (25 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total410
Reactions total116
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,610
Videos
109
Links
101

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
29s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

116 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52401759143602507712824.1%
custom 54133927786315944002622.4%
2118.1%
custom 53865060814951663281412.1%
custom 5474454908499401691108.62%
custom 525596637450890412397.76%
🌭43.45%
custom 525370456312645216632.59%
custom 544756735236952366610.862%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC8 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ia_Tacshe_AnonimniyPolsovatelPhoto

Глупые и экспериментальные рисунки и зарисовки. Плюсом редизайны и новые персонажи! 😊 Теперь у Такта(🌟) есть хендлер! Ура!! 🤣

1

Signed whmi

6 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC22 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

А да кста И на Кристиана тоже (Он был нарисован раньше чем Салли—) #реф

custom 52401759143602507715custom 54133927786315944004custom 547445490849940169141

Signed whmi

4 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC32 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Чувакии Нормальный референс на Санни и её хендлера— #реф

custom 52401759143602507716custom 54133927786315944004custom 538650608149516632831

Signed whmi

2 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC34 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @TishsSlogPhoto

🔢🔢🔢🔢❎❎❎ 🤩Решил немного перерисовывать старые арты. Уже сохранил некоторые, и вот потихоньку рисунькаю😎 🤩Вообще я очень удивлён, что раньше как-то умудрялся рисовать на телефоне пальцем, потому что сейчас я немощь без карандаша и планшета. Хотя рисунки 2024 года были в основном нарисованы на старом планшете с памятью 32 Гб, и всё так же пальцем. Это было пыткой, потому что он так лагал... Но как будто мне было очень

2custom 54744549084994016911

Signed whmi

1 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC24 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ia_Tacshe_AnonimniyPolsovatelPhoto

Омггг, это же Коллаб с Персиком!!! 🙏🙏🙏 Вы в шоке??? А я уж в тем более!!!😮

3

Signed whmi

1 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC31 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Попробовала новый стиль окраса) Беттиии

custom 52559663745089041237custom 52401759143602507714custom 541339277863159440031🌭1custom 52537045631264521661custom 54475673523695236661custom 54744549084994016911

Signed whmi

31 Jul 2026, 10:37 UTC31 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Угадайте ктооо сделал небольшой редизайн на Мамори? я кнш, кто же ещё— #реф

custom 52401759143602507715custom 53865060814951663284custom 541339277863159440041🌭1custom 54744549084994016911

Signed whmi

30 Jul 2026, 22:20 UTC35 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @QQMINNPhoto

реквестик спустя сто лет вроде это она да #реквест

2

Signed whmi

27 Jul 2026, 17:16 UTC46 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ЭТО МОЙ МУУУУЖЖЖ ЭТО МОЙ МАЛЬЧИИККККК #реф #ПАБЛО

custom 54133927786315944008custom 53865060814951663285custom 52401759143602507713custom 547445490849940169121🌭1custom 52537045631264521661

Signed whmi

26 Jul 2026, 07:32 UTC39 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @room_tenVideo

Мини анимка с персонажем Лисы

custom 524017591436025077131custom 52559663745089041231custom 54133927786315944001

Signed whmi

25 Jul 2026, 22:08 UTC33 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @room_tenVideo

Video, posted without a caption

2🌭1custom 54133927786315944001

Signed whmi

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @whaha_itsmeagain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 332,093 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“В гостях у Лисы (14+)” (@whaha_itsmeagain), 38 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whaha_itsmeagain.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.