Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Deal with White | Сделка с Белым

Channel

Deal with White | Сделка с Белым

@wh1te_deal

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

133subscribers

+18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003104693385
TypeChannel
Username@wh1te_deal
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/wh1te_deal

Growth

1151331247 August 2026 — 115 subscribers8 August 2026 — 116 subscribers9 August 2026 — 116 subscribers16 August 2026 — 133 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days, net +18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 112–136 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 19:25133+17
9 Aug 2026, 05:17116no change
8 Aug 2026, 09:38116+1
7 Aug 2026, 17:28115first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 12 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
59.4%
avg views ÷ 133 subscribers
Avg views / post
79.0
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held14 (12 April 20268 August 2026)
Views total395
Reactions total57
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

130 reactions across 12 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2519.2%
2216.9%
😁1914.6%
😭107.69%
custom 523554542421908797286.15%
🤣86.15%
🕊75.38%
custom 523596006895178104564.62%
custom 537060760291903121764.62%
💯64.62%
custom 518846431484290171053.85%
💩43.08%
custom 523574430267972837032.31%
🔥10.769%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 130reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 14 we hold a reading for · 36%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wh1te_deal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 April 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 21:12 UTC38 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

07.08-08.08 лично: 150$ офис: 600$ рефка: 350$ ===1100$ Итого: 4700 $ из 36000 $ 7ого я хотел поработать с максимальными усилиями в соло въебался в новый блок, затильтил и решил сделать паузу, все таки 1000$ в одно рыло неподъемная задача на данном методе - трафика и выплат категорически не хватает

3💯3custom 523554542421908797221

6 Aug 2026, 22:04 UTC76 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

06.08 Я наворкал - 250$ Офис - 175$ Рефка - 100$ Итого: 3600 $ из 36000 $ завтра хочу убиться и сделать 1000$ дохода своими руками и покикать сотрудников, кто не выполняет минимальный поставленный план первый поток вставший на метод пока расчухивается, завтра думаю покажут хороший доход, всем доброй ночи😁

5🕊42😁1custom 52355454242190879721

6 Aug 2026, 00:39 UTC85 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026

За первые 5 дней августа у меня вышло: Личным ворком - 1050$ Офисом - 900$ Рефкой - 1125$ Итого: 3075 $ из 36000 $ Дальше буду подводить итоги, каждый день 😁

8custom 52355454242190879723🕊2🤣1

5 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC91 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

По челленджу буду вести в канале дневник, как иду к тройке, её цена - 3кк ₽ // 36к $ доход будет 3 видов только с этого мануала: 1) Личные усилия ежедневная работа именно своими руками 2) Офис 3) Деньги со среза и масштабирования на внешние команды планирую на каждом пункте сделать по ляму за 30 дней

54custom 52355454242190879722

5 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC105 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ЗАПУСКАЮ МЕТОД ПОД СРЕЗ И ЧЕЛЛЕНДЖ BMW 330i ЗА МЕСЯЦ Знаете эту тему когда ток в проц заходили на калькуляторе умножаете получаете что через месяц будет урус, а идет несколько лет и не пахнет даже тройкой Вот я давно не считаю на калькуляторе ниче, но сейчас я готов в последний раз поверить в процессинг О МАНУАЛЕ: •20-30к оборота в мелкочек в круг, без прогревов отлег, откупов нспк и прочей хуеты •нездоровая

43😁2💯1

9 Jun 2026, 07:04 UTC374 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Разлокал личную тоже себе, обращайтесь 😁@strawberry_math

1 Jun 2026, 02:46 UTC520 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁9🤣73

7 May 2026, 06:38 UTC444 views7 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @teammescoPhoto

Когда учишь молодых воркеров вести учет 😁

😁5💯1custom 52357443026797283701

4 May 2026, 12:15 UTC389 views5 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

И на этом моменте дроп восстанавливает карту 😪😪

custom 52357443026797283702🕊1😁1😭1

4 May 2026, 11:16 UTC754 views11 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

Если у тебя тим лидка, и у меня тим лидка, мы можем говорить о законе. Если у тебя , и у меня выплатный токен, мы можем говорить о правилах. Если ты пришел с пустыми руками, и я пришел с пустыми руками, (оба с расширенном КУСом и без превилегий) мы можем говорить о разуме. Но если у тебя есть тим лидка, а у меня только выплатный токен, то правда на твоей стороне. Если у тебя есть тим лидка, а у меня ничего, то, что

9💯1😁1

15 Apr 2026, 01:05 UTC364 views18 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

На этот байбит я депал деньги ещё с Garantex времён 25ого этажа, Berebit, использовал его как прослойку Gara-BB-Bin, чтобы не попасть под санкции, торговал в стакане с постоянниками💀, держал в пике на балансе 100к$, выводил на него рефку, когда был Лидом ещё на T2P💀, пополнял и выводил все балансы и страховые на все площадки, где стояли я и мои команды, в конце концов принимал деньги за выводы блоков Отп💀 Этот байби

😭7custom 52359600689517810456custom 53706076029190312174🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @wh1te_deal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Deal with White | Сделка с Белым” (@wh1te_deal), 133 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wh1te_deal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.