Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

๐Ÿ‘๏ธโƒค๐Ÿ”ฑ๐’ฒ๐”ฅ๐›บ๐“ฎ๐“‹๐”ข๐–— ๐”ฏ๐”ข๐‘Ž๐’น๐“ผ โ˜ฅ๐”ฅ๐–Ž๐“ผ ๐–Ž๐“ผ ๐†od๊ฉ“๐ฆ€๐‘œฟ๐Ÿ‘๏ธโƒคเผ€

@werdasliestistgott

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

258subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001260156475
TypeChannel
Username@werdasliestistgott
DescriptionWhoever writes this is just a @reflexyzi0ne เผ€Kanal(isierung) des Gรถttlichen๐‘“‡ เผ€Wahrheit = Freiheit = Liebe๐‘“‡ Wahrheit, welche die Freiheit verleiht, selbst Liebe zu sein. Wir sind alle ein Gott. Wahrheit Ende. ---------- @BetOnG0D เคถเคฟเคตเฅ‹เคฝเคนเคฎเฅ @Psybientflac
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/werdasliestistgott

Growth

2587 Aug 2026, 17:48 โ€” 258 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:16 โ€” 258 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:488 Aug 2026, 09:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 257โ€“259 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 09:16258no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:48258first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
15.6%
avg views รท 258 subscribers
Avg views / post
40.3
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.82%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held18 (20 May 2026 โ€“ 28 July 2026)
Views total282
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
โ‰ˆ2,400
Videos
โ‰ˆ277
Links
โ‰ˆ9

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ”ฅ350.0%
๐Ÿฅฐ233.3%
โšก116.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 16:03 UTC36 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @deezload2botFile

File, posted without a caption

12 Jun 2026, 22:46 UTC119 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @BetOnG0D

Everyone has values. A person who is aware of these assets naturally has a higher sense of self-worth as a result. If they possess a certain level of self-worth, they will automatically and subconsciously radiate this. Material abundance will then follow into their life, but one must first be ready to receive it. One very important asset, for example, is knowledge about our world. Another important asset is personal โ€ฆ

12 Jun 2026, 22:46 UTC80 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @BetOnG0D

This means that the moment I focus entirely on making money and, so to speak, offer my time or energy in exchange for it right from the start, I become dependent on it and am nothing more than a servant of money. That is when the negative aspect of money takes hold of you. You are under its control. The crazy thing is that, as the creator of money, man should actually be the lord and master of moneyโ€ฆ For money is a โ€ฆ

12 Jun 2026, 22:46 UTC76 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @BetOnG0D

Take a look at the current state of the world. The world is full of problems. This is the best time imaginable to find solutions and put them forward. Now is the time to find solutions and offer solutions that can genuinely help people. The focus is on creating value and generating wealth. Through the money you have created, you are able to make this wealth available to the right people, so that they can improve theiโ€ฆ

12 Jun 2026, 22:46 UTC71 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @BetOnG0DPhoto

Money is, first and foremost, a tool for steering development and human behaviour, and a mechanism of control. It is worth taking a moment to let this fact sink in. Now, broadly speaking, there are two ways of dealing with money. Either you control the money and the flow of money โ€“ and that is precisely the mindset of wealthy people. Or the money controls your behaviour โ€“ and that is exactly what applies to people wโ€ฆ

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @werdasliestistgott. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 814,798 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐Ÿ‘๏ธโƒค๐Ÿ”ฑ๐’ฒ๐”ฅ๐›บ๐“ฎ๐“‹๐”ข๐–— ๐”ฏ๐”ข๐‘Ž๐’น๐“ผ โ˜ฅ๐”ฅ๐–Ž๐“ผ ๐–Ž๐“ผ ๐†od๊ฉ“๐ฆ€๐‘œฟ๐Ÿ‘๏ธโƒคเผ€โ€ (@werdasliestistgott), 258 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/werdasliestistgott.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.