Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for möfo ft. Wen Travladd refund?

Channel

möfo ft. Wen Travladd refund?

@wentravladdrefund

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

19subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001684129940
TypeChannel
Username@wentravladdrefund
Description@mofolabsportal mofo.app
Created21 April 2022measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/wentravladdrefund

Growth

197 August 2026 — 19 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18–20 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 16:4619no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:2119first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 21 April 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 April 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
3
Videos
3
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5m 07s
Average length
1m 42s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

63 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3657.1%
1828.6%
👎57.94%
😁23.17%
😱23.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2022 to 21 April 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Apr 2022, 12:18 UTC≈1,320 views15 reactionsread 11 August 2026

TY Benson for his charity towards presale investors that may or may not have gotten rekt because of his mistake. Still waiting on the funds he owes the project.

👍93👎3

21 Apr 2022, 12:18 UTC≈1,300 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Benson has refunded some presale investors! What a great man! Not the project though. BTW don't know how anyone can think this but Benson is not the owner of the project.

7👎1

21 Apr 2022, 12:18 UTC≈1,320 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Already over 8k refunded so far, I'll be with the rest of dm's soon, already replied to plenty, don't mind putting money from our pockets to help presalers tbh

8👎1

21 Apr 2022, 02:30 UTC≈1,710 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍3😁1

21 Apr 2022, 02:27 UTC≈1,450 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Dear @AMA_Central Team, 1. Benson let Doxxed know that you were unable to post only after you failed to post it at 3pm UTC as agreed. That is not "with enough prior time" for us to arrange for additional prelaunch marketing posts to happen at the time. 2. Benson stated himself that: Benson, [18/4/22 3:45 PM] the most important thing Benson, [18/4/22 3:45 PM] is the hype post Benson, [18/4/22 3:45 PM] before launch

👍9😁1

21 Apr 2022, 02:22 UTC≈1,080 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

I told Doxxed to schedule the AMA since he won’t refund us. Read, no replies.

👍3😱1

21 Apr 2022, 02:21 UTC987 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

My entire chat with Benson including: 1. Me asking him to confirm what we would be paying for. 2. Him telling me he will post prelaunch because the most important part is the prelaunch hype post. 3. Benson insisting that what we paid for was an AMA, and they had no obligation to do prelaunch post. 4. Benson telling me that he will not refund us because according to him, we paid for an AMA, and he wants to do the

😱1

21 Apr 2022, 02:12 UTC871 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Travladd claiming that he and Benson are separate entities, so he can’t refund us.

👍1

21 Apr 2022, 02:05 UTC820 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Benson then told Doxxed that he would post us before launch, then told us he forgot because he was showering. He then got angry that we told people in the chat that the Travladd post didn’t go up because he made a mistake. And then he told us that the launch was a shit show and he wasn’t going to post us.

👍1

21 Apr 2022, 02:01 UTC782 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Benson letting us know that he won’t be able to post us because he made a mistake and posted another project. “Yep these things happen” 🙂

👍2

21 Apr 2022, 01:35 UTC742 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

At this point I no longer wanted anything to do with Benson or Travladd. I think it's pretty clear that both the community and team had high hopes that Travladd would hype the launch, hence the importance that the post went out at the agreed time. The post not going out on schedule meant: (a) There was insufficient hype for launch. Market conditions were already bad so we knew we needed a large name to add hype and

👍3

21 Apr 2022, 01:31 UTC646 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

17 Apr 2022 3pm the team (@mofokerr, @mofolabs and @alwaysdoxxed) had a call to discuss prelaunch marketing plans. Doxxed told us that he managed to get Travladd and it would cost $7k for 1 pinned post & 1 AMA, or $10k for 2 pinned posts & 1 AMA. We told him to okay the $7k package and he sent me Travladd's wallet on Telegram. 11pm Presale concluded on GemPad. 18 Apr 2022 4am We decided that we would postpone lau

👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @wentravladdrefund. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“möfo ft. Wen Travladd refund?” (@wentravladdrefund), 19 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wentravladdrefund.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.