Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

звёздная пыль.

@wennrou

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

121subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002027139208
TypeChannel
Username@wennrou
Descriptionwenrou // Настя leader of @howling_cdt рабочий тгк (ps): @rourou_ps лс: @maelechka
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/wennrou

Growth

1219 Aug 2026, 02:01 — 121 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 03:46 — 121 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 02:019 Aug 2026, 03:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 120–122 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 03:46121no change
9 Aug 2026, 02:01121first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.9%
avg views ÷ 121 subscribers
Avg views / post
58.0
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
25.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held18 (3 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,044
Reactions total263
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,640
Videos
1,360
Links
273

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 11s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

263 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 534400128124769779110841.1%
custom 53437842909099666257729.3%
custom 53594320722450447077327.8%
custom 519318125408579380451.90%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 263reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC22 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ssyrnikeeVideo

топ любимых моментов в этом кавере

custom 53440012812476977916custom 53437842909099666252custom 53594320722450447072

8 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC28 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @dianabgarVideo

две тренировки из трех в зале метр на метр, но ради этой партии я готова была страдать

custom 53440012812476977919custom 53437842909099666254custom 53594320722450447073

8 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC37 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026

все бежим-бежим смотреть!! https://youtu.be/j8AcRFNitGQ?is=15ph126g1E5IifHq

custom 53440012812476977917custom 53437842909099666255custom 53594320722450447072

8 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC31 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @howling_cdtPhoto

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 – // If you feel it, let it show _ 🌟 wenrou as Ricky 🌟 upcoming... – 08.08 [ 🔑 ] 03.00pm 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 #teaser

custom 53440012812476977918custom 53437842909099666254custom 53594320722450447073

7 Aug 2026, 21:42 UTC49 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026

сегодня будет возвращение моего рики после килл зе ромео, не самая лучшая попытка в него, но для меня очень важно, чтобы вы меня поддержали. 🥺🥺🥺 в следующий раз я постараюсь больше и буду довольна своим рики.

custom 535943207224504470710custom 53440012812476977915custom 53437842909099666254custom 51931812540857938042

7 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC32 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @howling_cdtVideo

▪️▪️▪️▪️ take you down make you realise ✨ // . [ 08.08 || 3 p.m. ]

custom 53594320722450447077custom 53437842909099666253custom 53440012812476977912

6 Aug 2026, 19:49 UTC54 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

а вообще хей хей доучен до конца, но я не представляю, как это танцевать на единичке и при этом доделывать все движения. 🙏🙏🙏

custom 53440012812476977915custom 51931812540857938041custom 53437842909099666251custom 53594320722450447071

6 Aug 2026, 19:48 UTC54 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

мы с улей пикми.

custom 53437842909099666256custom 53440012812476977912custom 53594320722450447071

6 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC57 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

незнакомые девочки подошли и подарили мне этот прелестный мини букетик. жаль только, что в такие моменты я очень сильно теряюсь и не знаю что сказать.

custom 534400128124769779113custom 53594320722450447077custom 53437842909099666255

6 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC129 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

интересное.

custom 53437842909099666259custom 53594320722450447074custom 53440012812476977913

6 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC57 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

типичный день в соул дэнс.

custom 534400128124769779110custom 53594320722450447073custom 53437842909099666252

6 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC58 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026

а вы будете со мной дружить?

custom 53437842909099666258custom 53440012812476977915custom 53594320722450447074

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @wennrou. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 159,071 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“звёздная пыль.” (@wennrou), 121 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wennrou.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.