топ любимых моментов в этом кавере
custom 53440012812476977916custom 53437842909099666252custom 53594320722450447072

Channel
@wennrou
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
121subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002027139208 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wennrou |
| Description | wenrou // Настя leader of @howling_cdt рабочий тгк (ps): @rourou_ps лс: @maelechka |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wennrou |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 121 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 121 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (3 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,044 |
| Reactions total | 263 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
263 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5344001281247697791 | 108 | 41.1% | |
| custom 5343784290909966625 | 77 | 29.3% | |
| custom 5359432072245044707 | 73 | 27.8% | |
| custom 5193181254085793804 | 5 | 1.90% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 263reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
топ любимых моментов в этом кавере
custom 53440012812476977916custom 53437842909099666252custom 53594320722450447072
две тренировки из трех в зале метр на метр, но ради этой партии я готова была страдать
custom 53440012812476977919custom 53437842909099666254custom 53594320722450447073
все бежим-бежим смотреть!! https://youtu.be/j8AcRFNitGQ?is=15ph126g1E5IifHq
custom 53440012812476977917custom 53437842909099666255custom 53594320722450447072
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 – // If you feel it, let it show _ 🌟 wenrou as Ricky 🌟 upcoming... – 08.08 [ 🔑 ] 03.00pm 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 #teaser
custom 53440012812476977918custom 53437842909099666254custom 53594320722450447073
сегодня будет возвращение моего рики после килл зе ромео, не самая лучшая попытка в него, но для меня очень важно, чтобы вы меня поддержали. 🥺🥺🥺 в следующий раз я постараюсь больше и буду довольна своим рики.
custom 535943207224504470710custom 53440012812476977915custom 53437842909099666254custom 51931812540857938042
▪️▪️▪️▪️ take you down make you realise ✨ // . [ 08.08 || 3 p.m. ]
custom 53594320722450447077custom 53437842909099666253custom 53440012812476977912
а вообще хей хей доучен до конца, но я не представляю, как это танцевать на единичке и при этом доделывать все движения. 🙏🙏🙏
custom 53440012812476977915custom 51931812540857938041custom 53437842909099666251custom 53594320722450447071
мы с улей пикми.
custom 53437842909099666256custom 53440012812476977912custom 53594320722450447071
незнакомые девочки подошли и подарили мне этот прелестный мини букетик. жаль только, что в такие моменты я очень сильно теряюсь и не знаю что сказать.
custom 534400128124769779113custom 53594320722450447077custom 53437842909099666255
интересное.
custom 53437842909099666259custom 53594320722450447074custom 53440012812476977913
типичный день в соул дэнс.
custom 534400128124769779110custom 53594320722450447073custom 53437842909099666252
а вы будете со мной дружить?
custom 53437842909099666258custom 53440012812476977915custom 53594320722450447074
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @wennrou. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 159,071 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“звёздная пыль.” (@wennrou), 121 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wennrou.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.