Channel
@wenlal3
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
738subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001946853443 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wenlal3 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wenlal3 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:59 | 738 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 737 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,835 |
| Reactions total | 382 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 04:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
382 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5267191585069627765 | 148 | 38.7% | |
| custom 5404647623921535397 | 100 | 26.2% | |
| custom 5267266291730775896 | 83 | 21.7% | |
| custom 5427351731581254743 | 51 | 13.4% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 382reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wenlal3. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 August 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
у меня всегда стоит режим не беспокоить , но я его даже выключила лишь бы отслеживать увидит или нет ….. у меня паранойя уже
custom 540464762392153539714custom 52671915850696277657custom 54273517315812547432
УРА Я ВЫЛОЖИЛА ОН ОЧ УГАРНЫЙ ПОЛУЧИЛСЯ ВХВХХВ УМОЛЯЮ ПЕРЕЙДИТЕ ПО ССЫЛКЕ РЕПОСТНИТЕ И ОТМЕТЬТЕ Я ХОЧУ ЧТОБ ОН УВИДЕЛ ЭТОТ ШЕДЕВР НЕСКОЛЬКО ДНЕЙ СТАРАЛАСЬ https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4nvnS15/
custom 526719158506962776515custom 54046476239215353977custom 54273517315812547433custom 52672662917307758961
омг привет видос где то в час будет
custom 526719158506962776519custom 54273517315812547433
гспд красава морат с др
custom 540464762392153539712custom 54273517315812547433custom 52671915850696277652
добрый текст в честь дня рождения давида игоревича ;)) сейчас ему уже 33, а я помню еще с 27 ашалееть в первый раз в тиктоке я услышала песню катя кищук, мне зашло, а прям любовь пошла с «я тебя никогда не отдам мусорам». я помню первый его концерт, на котором я была был в начале 2023 в кроп арене, где было не так уж и много людей, а уже в мае 2026 я была в огромном стадионе с ебанутейшим шоу. если честно я даже особ…
custom 540464762392153539724custom 52672662917307758967custom 52671915850696277655
всем вам возомнила себя звездой лянь на нее
custom 526719158506962776522custom 52672662917307758962custom 54273517315812547432
а я корчу лицо в рожицу ахегао хочу вайб этой песни
custom 526726629173077589613custom 54046476239215353972custom 54273517315812547432
мама сказала чтоб я удалила эти материалы из интернета когда стала учителем
custom 526726629173077589635custom 542735173158125474315custom 526719158506962776512
как снять тикток со скалли милано сука я видела девочка сняла
custom 540464762392153539718custom 52672662917307758962custom 54273517315812547432
я очень рада , что много кому кроме меня слово сымпровизируй кажется максимально неправильным
custom 526719158506962776526custom 526726629173077589612custom 54273517315812547432
наконец то проект икс вышел , я так ждала , аж футболку заранее купила
custom 526719158506962776522custom 54046476239215353977custom 54273517315812547434custom 52672662917307758963
еще есть видос под тысячи рук он пиздец душевный но почему то тут не прогружается
custom 526719158506962776513custom 52672662917307758968custom 54273517315812547437
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @wenlal3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,097,625 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“венлале” (@wenlal3), 738 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wenlal3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.