Channel
@wenjie1666
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
517subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001505549520 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wenjie1666 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wenjie1666 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 517 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 521 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 522 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 966 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 04:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
📱📱微博白号大量现货📱📱 信用分420-499 3年以上老号 6u 信用分500-569 3年以上老号8u 信用分570-599 3年以上老号12u 信用分600-619 3年以上老号14u 信用分620-649 3年以上老号16u 信用分650-689 3年以上老号19u 大量微博白号（包登录包上号） 黄V. 带超级会员 军事35u财经38u 公司认证蓝v 🉑️定制 100-200u都🈶️ 代充会员 普通5u 超级7u 有需要私聊群老板✈️： @wenjie166
哔哩哔哩 2级实名 3级实名 4级实名 5级实名 2级千粉实名店铺 3级千粉实名店铺 4级千粉实名店铺 5级千粉实名店铺 不是回流货，不会回流货。 包登录，包七天找回留卡20+ 2-3-4级包20天找回
soul云机未实名百 带设备转移 目前比市场上上的云机还要稳。
私人月———实名陌陌 丝滑板 【全网独家货源】 售后：包登 包秒 包一个月找回 🉑️解封 ——-只要不是永久都能解封 在线接单子～～
云机手表⌚️微信，最i玩自己提供设备 vmos我设备转移 需要改资料的发我
哔哩哔哩 2级实名80 3级实名120 4级实名140 5级实名220 2级千粉实名店铺120 3级千粉实名店铺180 4级千粉实名店铺200 5级千粉实名店铺290 不是回流货，不会回流货 包登录，包七天找回留卡20+
私人抖音 安卓备份包 可登真机。一键上号 独家渠道。
正反带支付 包首笔 老号大量上货 有需要来撩
微信 视频号 橱窗 蓝v验证号
企业 微信 手机 二合1 三合1 出货
云机服务号 公众号
钉钉加人恢复
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wenjie1666. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,219,236 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“顺利【微信Q 企业钉钉 抖音 快手 微博” (@wenjie1666), 517 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wenjie1666.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.