Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

雯雯的朋友圈

@wen5253

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

102subscribers

+80 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004319840269
TypeChannel
Username@wen5253
Description我的频道。@wen5253 私聊:@wenwen9897 机器人🤖:@wenwensx_bot
Created7 August 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/wen5253

Growth

22102629 Aug 2026, 08:30 — 22 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 03:01 — 102 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 03:02 — 102 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 08:3010 Aug 2026, 03:02
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +80. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10–114 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 03:02102no change
10 Aug 2026, 03:01102+80
9 Aug 2026, 08:3022first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
183.3%
avg views ÷ 102 subscribers
Avg views / post
187
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.409%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held12 (7 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total1,870
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 03:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
8
Videos
1
Links
8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC196 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🎉 学院派雯雯半价优惠券活动 🎁 奖品清单 • 1p半价优惠券 × 1 🛡️ 参与条件 • 加入 广州学院派 • 加入 雯雯的朋友圈 • 加入 广州学院派公开榜 • 加入 广州学院优选帮 • 加入 广州学院派报告 • 加入 广州学院派榜单(备份榜) • 加入 广州学院派(备份群) • 参加抽奖后需在 广州学院派 内发言20次 └ 群内发送“抽奖进度”查看完成度(每日限5次) • 必须设置用户名 🔮 祝福加持 • 祝福消耗:3学院分 • 祝福上限:150次 • 祝福一次增加一个抽奖号,提高中奖率 • 幸运值祝福:支持 幸运值说明 ⌛ 开奖时间 • 2026-08-13 13:00:00 📜 抽奖说明 兑奖联系: @wenwen9897 1.禁止买卖优惠券,发现封禁处理,转让需要老师同意,半价优惠券所有权归老师所有 2.半价优惠券有效期为7天,中奖者需要七天内出击并且提交报告,不是老师的原因超时不出击交报告永久拉黑抽

1

9 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC177 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @GZNMMTL

【嫩妹报告】https://telegram.me/GZNMHEJI 【老师艺名】雯雯 【联系方式】@wenwen9897 【所在位置】天河 安全 【验证留名】汤姆猫 【验证时间】2026.08.09 【修车费用】700p 【颜值身材】偏瘦 小翘臀 【服务内容】高级公寓很干净 一开门亮眼 没想到是个日式小女友 进门开始嘘寒问暖 声音糯糯的 很舒服一下就放松了 完全不催 顺着你来 关键是嫩妹居然还有服务 会水中萧 还有不少加速战斗服装!开盲盒开到宝了 妹妹才过来真怕以后不好约 【服务态度】超级好 百依百顺 【优点缺点】 苗条 长腿小翘臀 唯一缺点小馒头胸 但是软软很舒服 【推荐程度】9.5 【体验细节】很赞 ♥️温馨提示: 以上仅代表个人体验,报告仅供参考! 👎🏿府上专员严查假报告!写手代谢出门右转! 报告提交:@Chenyaoyao1_bot

9 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC210 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

第一天开课请哥哥们照顾一下啦😁

1

9 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC187 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @GZFYLBPhoto

艺名:雯雯 地区:#天河 标签:69 蛇 水中萧 丝袜制服 消费: 700p 1300pp 联系:@wenwen9897 频道:https://t.me/wen5253

9 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC182 viewsread 10 August 2026

https://telegram.me/GZFYJT 雯雯 已在凤吟视频验证上榜,可放心出击 点击下方连接可一键验证 @GZFYLB

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @wen5253. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 517,155 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“雯雯的朋友圈” (@wen5253), 102 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wen5253.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.