Channel
@welkomonia
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
460subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002224095060 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @welkomonia |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/welkomonia |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 08:01 | 460 | -4 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 464 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 465 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 464 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:49 | 461 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 461 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
931 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5222195626481049698 | 176 | 18.9% | |
| custom 5303547314999152021 | 164 | 17.6% | |
| 🍓 | 163 | 17.5% | |
| custom 5192674112937415800 | 141 | 15.1% | |
| custom 5292242535874317345 | 137 | 14.7% | |
| custom 5262837695117286835 | 124 | 13.3% | |
| custom 5188465508843792452 | 15 | 1.61% | |
| custom 5463206522295184749 | 11 | 1.18% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 931 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
я так понимаю у многих проблема в том чтобы дочитывать фанфики, какого хера даже самые любимые фф в итоге идут в дальнюю полку со словами «ну потом дочитаю» (хотя книги абсолютно всегда прочитаны полностью даже если не нравится что читаешь) у кого жиза не жиза мякните, да и ваши предположения какого хуя ??!!
custom 519267411293741580010custom 52221956264810496984custom 52922425358743173451
короче ребятки я как ангел спаситель к вам у кого такая же проблема или кто столкнется с этим, вот вам лайфак как вернуть тик ток родной и быть опять зависимым❤️
custom 530354731499915202112custom 529224253587431734510custom 52628376951172868351
я хочу оч сильно подраться с тик током с 2023 года кто со мной?
custom 522219562648104969817custom 526283769511728683510custom 52922425358743173457🍓3
ток собралась силами начать вести тики ток стабильно возвращаться в свое болото так мне тик ток подкинул подлянку и у меня на этом акке ТОЛЬКО старый ТИк ток ебучий!!! сук ни один впн не справляется, причем это ток на этом акке шо за хуйня братанчик (еще у меня зарядка 67) это намек жырный походу что пошла ка я нахуй ???!
🍓16custom 529224253587431734511custom 51926741129374158008custom 52221956264810496981
в чом прикол я рантше ваще не стеснялась как либо показываться на камеру и делать какую-то хуйню, а щас я думаю обоже я выгляжу глупо тупо!!!! боже где мое наплевательство я шотала этот ебучий тик ток <<< раунд
custom 530354731499915202123🍓6
пересматриваю свои старые видео, почему я была такая смешная и прикольная куда подевалась вся моя аура, срочно перечитывать эрху надеюсь заново отупею
custom 519267411293741580022custom 52628376951172868357custom 53035473149991520215
хэ юй такой тепленький мальчик
custom 530354731499915202123custom 522219562648104969815custom 51926741129374158007custom 52628376951172868353
школоло егэшники мои, первые пошли, УСПЕХОВ ВАМ И ХОРОШИХ КИМОВ🙏🙏🙏
custom 526283769511728683533custom 529224253587431734517custom 53035473149991520215custom 52221956264810496984
йоу пр ребятки, скучали дададад??? ну давайте я сделаю вид что жоска готовлюсь к егэ не просыхая и поэтому нету времени на чтение хохохохо лан на самом деле чот от китаевщины отошла, хотя все еще есть новеллки которые хотела бы почитать (или перечитать моих любимых монахов «медные монеты), но вот всеее таки я решила вернуться в год так 22?? тик ток букток и ебать взяла в руки трилогию воздушного народа😭😭 уже вот проч…
custom 522219562648104969839custom 530354731499915202116custom 526283769511728683512custom 52922425358743173453🍓2
а ну и с Рождеством там и с Новым годом кстате 😏😛😛
custom 522219562648104969824custom 529224253587431734515🍓6custom 51926741129374158001
будет конечно няшно если вы ответите в комментариях и поясните почему выбрали, но для моих няшек стесняшек создам опрос💕
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 530354731499915202114🍓5custom 52628376951172868355custom 51926741129374158001
ВСЕМ гучи ребятки скучали??😏😏🫰 я как обычно конечно же камбэкнусь к вам с ИНТЕРЕСНЫМИ вопросами, это такой интерактивчик в стиле Хэ Юя медкарты и все в этом роде, думаю фанаты медкарты для вас это будет особенно интересно ну в общем, что ты выберешь, какую чертову таблетку джокера ты съешь, В КАКУЮ ситуацию ты бы выбрала попасть(отвечают все без исключения) выбор 1. Чтобы ваша мамуля наняла детектива и этот герой з…
custom 526283769511728683524custom 530354731499915202112🍓10custom 51926741129374158004
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @welkomonia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
будет конечно няшно если вы ответите в комментариях и поясните почему выбрали, но для моих няшек стесняшек создам опрос💕
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2025 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@welkomonia named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“эта Достопочтенная Оня🦋” (@welkomonia), 460 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/welkomonia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.