Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for [ᴡᴇɪʀᴅ ᴛʏᴘᴇs] АРХИВ

Channel

[ᴡᴇɪʀᴅ ᴛʏᴘᴇs] АРХИВ

@weirdtypes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

596subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001946466480
TypeChannel
Username@weirdtypes
Created1 June 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/weirdtypes

Growth

596599597.57 August 2026 — 599 subscribers8 August 2026 — 599 subscribers8 August 2026 — 598 subscribers16 August 2026 — 596 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 596–599 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 07:55596-2
8 Aug 2026, 05:00598-1
8 Aug 2026, 03:15599no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:03599first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 24 May 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

396 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥14135.6%
🍓8120.5%
custom 54111442386980847026215.7%
💯4912.4%
🥰4511.4%
👍102.53%
custom 541383333919694455382.02%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 396reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2024 to 10 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @weirdtypes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 May 2024 to 10 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Sept 2025, 08:32 UTC732 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026

второй админ уже пятый год батрачит на юрфаке и хотел бы поблагодарить всех за отдачу на постах было очень приятно отчасти вариться в тпкм, делая его немного красивее своими дизайнами

🥰23🍓10

10 Sept 2025, 08:17 UTC750 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026

давно ещё нужно было закрыться, но что-то было не до этого спасибо всем кто был у нас в тпл конфе или с кем я хоть как-то пересекался и общался, было весело. спасибо тпкм за всё, это был мой первый опыт ведения тгк :) осень 23-лето 24 мой прайм

💯18❤‍🔥7🍓5

10 Sept 2025, 08:16 UTC719 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

админ поступил в мед постов больше не будет

💯15🍓3

20 Mar 2025, 07:01 UTC≈1,460 views41 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

с днем рождения меня 🎉

❤‍🔥24🍓11🥰5👍1

28 Jul 2024, 10:02 UTC≈4,000 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🤩 О самых «странных» централах — ИЭИ и ИЛИ 🤩 Как, в общем-то, всем хорошо известно, централы зачастую являются главной движущей силой исторических процессов. Почему же? 🌟 Основным ответом на этот вопрос является тот факт, что у ТИМов из Беты и Гаммы есть ценностная черная сенсорика, которая дает им способность продвигаться по жизни сравнительно успешнее, чем это делает периферия. Из этого следует, что большая часть

🍓21❤‍🔥9custom 54138333391969445538👍3custom 54111442386980847022

Signed мария

21 Jul 2024, 11:10 UTC≈2,440 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🪨SOCIO X SECOND WORLD WAR🌞 #typing

custom 541114423869808470228🍓8❤‍🔥5💯2👍1

Signed шкаф премиум

2 Jul 2024, 11:02 UTC≈2,640 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✨💛💛💛✨ Периферийный тип из Альфа-квадры, наиболее приспособленный для социальной реализации cr: Daniela Tieni, Perry Rowe🖤

❤‍🔥23custom 54111442386980847028🍓4🥰4

Signed шкаф премиум

12 Jun 2024, 10:04 UTC≈3,430 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

👻SOCIO X FIGURES OF THE 90-S🌟 вдохновлено — шином #typing

❤‍🔥18custom 541114423869808470211💯5🥰2

Signed шкаф премиум

9 Jun 2024, 10:05 UTC≈3,010 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

INFORMATION ABOUT WT 🌟наши типологии: шкаф: LSI SO6 692 LVEF мария: EIE SO2 251 VEFL о канале в основном пишем о соционике и психософии. также иногда разбираем типологии публичных личностей или персонажей💗 важные ссылки:🖤 навигация ✅ аккаунт на пдб 📎 анонимка 👻 забустить нас ✔️ под этим постом можете предлагать мью/анмью

🍓7💯3❤‍🔥2🥰2custom 54111442386980847021

Signed шкаф премиум

9 Jun 2024, 10:05 UTC≈2,710 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌟NAVIGATION 🌟основные тэги: #соционика #психософия #разбор #typing отдельное информационный пост

❤‍🔥8custom 54111442386980847025🍓4

Signed шкаф премиум

29 May 2024, 09:42 UTC≈10,600 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как отличать похожие ТИМы из одной квадры? 🌟Наверняка многие из вас, когда типируют кого-либо, достаточно легко определяют преобладающие аспекты — например, ценностная ЧС, преобладание этики над логикой, сенсорики над интуицией и так далее. Однако, это лишь сужает круг поиска ТИМа типируемого и не дает однозначный вариант социотипа🌟 🌪️Сегодня рассмотрим, как отличать зеркальщиков — ТИМов, чьи многомерные функции от

❤‍🔥17💯6custom 54111442386980847022🍓1

Signed шкаф премиум

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @weirdtypes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,321,862 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[ᴡᴇɪʀᴅ ᴛʏᴘᴇs] АРХИВ” (@weirdtypes), 596 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/weirdtypes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.