劳动权益困境 打工人的呐喊
Channel
Weibo‘
@weibo_select
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
933subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001969839747 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @weibo_select |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/weibo_select |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Oct 2026, 04:58 | 933 | -4 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:49 | 937 | -2 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 09:26 | 939 | -1 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 14:37 | 940 | -3 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 22:59 | 943 | -2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 22:00 | 945 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:40 | 947 | +3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 944 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:49 | 947 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 947 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 30s
- Average length
- 38s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
竞赛名校出不了菲尔兹奖得主
@镜子杂谈: #海外新鲜事# 得克萨斯州民主党联邦参议员候选人詹姆斯·塔拉里科:“这个国家真正的斗争,不是左派与右派之争,而是上层与底层之争。” 他说: 他们眼里没有红州和蓝州之分,只看得到钱。 在他们看来,我们都是可以被盘剥的人。他们把我们视为同一支对手队伍,那么我们也该开始像一支队伍那样行动。 现在是时候了。 是时候跨越这些人为制造的分裂,团结起来,共同对抗那些高高在上、长期盘剥我们的人。 因为这个国家真正的斗争,不是左派对右派,而是上层对底层。 这正是我们正在得克萨斯州建设的政治运动。 这不是一种诉诸恐惧的政治,也不是一种制造分裂的政治,而是一种团结的政治、友谊的政治、爱的政治。 阅读更多
@贝乐斯微博: 健康网红Bryan Johnson 患上了“自身免疫性胃炎”。他每年花费200万美元做各种检查,极其自律,吃各种补剂,纯素食。油管上的周医生(老周健康工作室)分析的很有道理。他这个病不是今天才有的,纯植物饮食可能有未知物质影响了肠道,造成肠漏,引发自身免疫系统攻击自身。这个网红之所以花几百万美元,吃各种补剂,一个重要原因就是植物性食物缺乏一些重要的营养成分,必须单独补充。植物为了自保,都练就了一身化学武器的独门武功,看似无害,实则凶险。因为不会放毒的植物,都被动物吃光了。
看到的新闻。看名字是蔡姓
别美化未走的路中美养老真实对比
小钱见修养
🤡1
@新西兰冷百科孙小社: 哈哈哈有可能,拜登不愧是美国最后一个古典政治家,居然还真的关心“惠及民生”。//@陆沉1900: 其实是几年前立的项终于轮到施工了,搞不好他得感谢拜登[流鼻血][流鼻血][流鼻血]//@Jokielicious:当美国的管理层做到中国的指甲盖程度的努力时美国人be like://@新西兰冷百科孙小社:说明了当一个政府把人们的期待值压到最低后,但凡做了一点点原属于政府职权范围内天经地义的工作,当地的人们收获的 ---------- 阅读更多
@麦卡PU10P: #北海道札幌杀人砍头事件# 【网页链接 】 【查看图片 】 协助的父母都是缓刑,女儿还在精神鉴定阶段//@你爹的三次方:日本之前也有一个,女儿被老头⭐️侵,一家三口合计着由女儿出面再次联系,爸爸埋伏实施反击,妈妈开车把父女俩带离,把对方头都剁了。一家人英勇极了//@麦卡PU10P:现实版《彷徨之刃》。再次遗憾东野圭吾走得太年轻//@湖上的朋友们:性侵犯,打死算为社会为民除害。//@famfamfam:"警方从冈萨雷斯手机中发现了更多视频,显示他对其他儿童实施了性虐待,其中包括涉及婴儿或学步儿童的录像。"//@简木生--撰稿者:转发微博 ---------- 阅读更多
社会学的意识形态危机
@TheCuriosityProject: 美国人对社会学的反思,有兴趣的人可以去看看华尔街日报的这篇文章。很多美国人也觉得现在的社会学已经变味儿了,不是客观研究社会问题,基于数据和事实,而是立场先行,套上了太浓厚的DEI, social justice学术外套。结果作茧自缚,束缚了自己学科的正常健康发展,大众对这么学科反而不信任了。
人生很长,我们先等一下
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @weibo_select. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@weibo_select named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 27 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Weibo‘” (@weibo_select), 933 subscribers as measured 29 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/weibo_select.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.