Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

WeChatTweak

@wechattweak

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

774subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001463468515
TypeChannel
Username@wechattweak
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/wechattweak

Growth

773774773.511 Aug 2026, 00:16 — 773 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 13:07 — 774 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 00:1611 Aug 2026, 13:07
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 773–774 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 13:07774+1
11 Aug 2026, 00:16773first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 2 September 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
21s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

253 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍11445.1%
11344.7%
👌114.35%
🔥72.77%
🤣51.98%
👏20.791%
🏆10.395%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 253reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2023 to 8 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Feb 2026, 13:33 UTC≈1,390 views28 reactionsread 11 August 2026

App Store 版本 34371 已经支持

28

11 Dec 2025, 07:10 UTC≈2,160 views43 reactionsread 11 August 2026

DMG 版本 32288 已经支持

27👍11🔥5

9 Dec 2025, 16:22 UTC≈2,160 views20 reactionsread 11 August 2026

https://github.com/sunnyyoung/WeChatTweak/releases/tag/2.0.1

👍137

9 Dec 2025, 09:39 UTC≈1,840 views14 reactionsread 11 August 2026

考虑增加 App Store 版本 patch 支持,App Store 版本更新没那么频繁😅

👍95

9 Dec 2025, 09:25 UTC≈1,690 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

这更新也太快了😅今晚再跟进

👍5

8 Dec 2025, 02:43 UTC≈1,590 views32 reactionsread 11 August 2026

关于撤回提示功能,抽空再研究一下 😅

👍16👌114🔥1

7 Dec 2025, 06:31 UTC≈1,560 views16 reactionsread 11 August 2026

https://github.com/sunnyyoung/WeChatTweak 已提前正式发布 2.0.0 🎉 先上线再优化 😐 有问题再修吧 🙂‍↕️

14👍2

6 Dec 2025, 11:57 UTC≈1,270 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

整体观察已经没有太大问题,看来下周可以正式发布 2.0 了 🤔

8

6 Dec 2025, 08:59 UTC≈1,210 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

https://github.com/sunnyyoung/WeChatTweak/releases/tag/2.0-beta5 新增了 versions 命令,查询所有支持的 WeChat 版本

👍8🏆1

6 Dec 2025, 05:48 UTC≈1,000 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

支持了最新的 4.1.5(32281) https://github.com/sunnyyoung/WeChatTweak/releases/tag/2.0-beta4

5👍3

5 Dec 2025, 11:49 UTC883 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

支持多开了 https://github.com/sunnyyoung/WeChatTweak/releases/tag/2.0-beta3

👍32

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @wechattweak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Dec 2025, 15:07 UTCAnonymous Poll115 voters

需要支持 Intel (arch x86) 吗?

  1. YES40%
  2. NO60%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2023 to 8 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,084,981 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“WeChatTweak” (@wechattweak), 774 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wechattweak.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.