Пишут теперь любой недоброжелатель может засрать почту письмами с большими файлами, чтоб та потеряла вообще всю историю писем.
❤2

Channel
@webmust
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
449subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001491825842 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @webmust |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/webmust |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 449 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 450 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:29 | 450 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 17 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (17 March 2026 – 25 July 2026) |
| Views total | 430 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
20 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 9 | 45.0% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 25.0% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 15.0% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 5.00% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 5.00% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 5.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Пишут теперь любой недоброжелатель может засрать почту письмами с большими файлами, чтоб та потеряла вообще всю историю писем.
❤2
Яндекс контора пидарасов (напоминаю, чтобы не забывали), все нормальные давно оттуда ушли.
🔥1
Вышла модель Claude Opus 5 Поставить ее моделью по умолчанию в терминале можно через команду: /model claude-opus-5
По моему твердому убеждению, творчество неотделимо от исполнителя, – каким бы талантливым человек не был, я физически не могу слушать музыку тех, кто поддерживает военную агресиию РФ. Вызывает отвращение 🤢 Попался сайт, на котором обозначены позиции знаменитостей, не без аргументации: https://starsaboutwar.in.ua/ru/
🌚1👏1
Надо обязатетельно затестить, звук toggle – нектар для ушей, его бы на листание слайдера поставить, tick - hover по табам faq
У нас есть серьёзные сайты для людей, приносящие пользу. Хочется на этом закончить, но я ещё постараюсь ради ваших лайков, дорогие подписчики. Так вот, некоторые из сайтов старенькие, легаси времён, когда в браузере звук был только из игровой или рекламной флешки (объясни щас молодёжи, что речь не о носителе), а тег <audio> ещё вызывал вопросы. Там, конечно, не flash, но mp3. Несколько разных коротких звуков, все п…
❤1
любопытные данные с Arena AI claude-opus-4-7-thinking опережает в кодинге claude-opus-4-8-thinking и даже claude-fable-5 🤔 правда, в webdev все встает на свои места, вероятно акцент в разработке новых моделей antropic делает на вебе
🔥1
Бля как же меня радует решение этих головоломок это пиздец! Это как если бы ты пытался понять какую-то задачку по условному матанализу ... думал думал думал, и потом *дзинь* 💡 – это отдельное удовольствие мало с чем сравнимое.
в этот момент обычно раздается громкое "ААААААААААА" вот оно чо, Михалыч 😂
Кто любит головоломки – поиграйте в Patrick's Parabox (PP) – на нее до 9 июля вкусная 50% скидка в стиме. PP – это мозгодробильная головоломка на основе рекурсии, бустит навыки нестандартного мышления, некоторые уровни продуманы настолько круто что мозги буквально растекаются в попытках найти решение. Самый сок когда кажется что решения тупо нет, логика не работает, оставляешь уровень на потом, через какое-то время…
🔥1
С днём пробития очередного дна 😐
❤1🌚1
Восстание машин не за горами.. Внимательно проверяйте все команды, которые вам пишет ИИ! Делаю работы по сайту с помощью OPUS 4.8, нейронка внезапно выдала вот такую рекомендацию: # удали тестовую папку и неиспользуемый ext-файл меню rm -rf /var/www/site.com В том время как site.com – папка боевого сайта, а команда rm -rf – удалить рекурсивно все файлы и папки внутри директории, не знай я этого – снес бы к чертям …
🌚1💅1😎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @webmust. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вебмастер” (@webmust), 449 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/webmust.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.