2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 713–715 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Aug 2026, 23:16
714
no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:04
714
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
692
Videos
75
Links
678
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
316 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
162
51.3%
👍
68
21.5%
❤
28
8.86%
💯
26
8.23%
🎉
6
1.90%
😁
6
1.90%
⚡
4
1.27%
🙏
4
1.27%
🫡
4
1.27%
😎
3
0.949%
❤🔥
2
0.633%
🤝
2
0.633%
🕊
1
0.316%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 316reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 November 2024 to 1 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @webbrain_academy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 November 2024 to 1 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Albatta, Alloh taolo, Uning farishtalari, osmonlaru yer ahli, inidagi chumoli, hattoki dengizdagi baliq ham odamlarga yaxshilikni taʼlim beruvchining haqqiga duo qiladilar” (Imom Termiziy rivoyati).
Inson vafot etganda uning amali toʻxtaydi, faqat uch narsa tufayli (uning nomai aʼmoliga savob yozilib turadi): sadaqai joriya, foydali ilm, duoi xayr qiluvchi solih farzand.
Ustoz va murabbiylar kuni muborak bo’lsin.
…
Assalomu aleykum.
Webbrain academy video darsliklarini so'rab yozayotganlar bor ekan. Darslikar to'liq sotuvda. Adminga murojat qilsangiz bo`ladi.
👨💻Admin: @webbrainadmin
📷Instagram 🎬 You tube 🚀 Telegram
Rezyume nima va u qanday yoziladi?
Ish beruvchi birinchi bo‘lib sizning “rezyume”ingizni ko‘radi. Demak, rezyume bu sizning yuzingiz desak ham bo‘ladi.
“Rezyume”da siz maʼlumotlarni o‘zingiz haqingizdagi barcha maʼlumotlarni yoritib berishingiz kerak bo‘ladi.
"Rezyumeni qanday to‘ldirish kerak?", "Uni to‘ldirayotganda nimalarga eʼtibor berish kerak?" degan savollarga videoni to‘liq ko‘rib javob olishingiz mumkin.
…
⚡️ Endilikda HTML Expert darsliklari butunlay bepul.
☑️ Kecha izohlarda yozilgan fikrlaringizni o'qib chiqgan holda, HTML Expert darsliklarini to'liq bepul qilib chiqarishga va CSS Expert darsliklariga yana 5 ta bepul darslik qo'shishga qaror qildik. Pastdagi havolalar orqali darsliklarni ko'rishingiz mumkin.
HTML Expert: 🔗 havola
CSS Expert: 🔗 havola
In Shaa Alloh, Kelgusida Javascript dan ham yangi bepul darsl…
Bepul va professional darsliklarga qanday qaraysiz? 🤔
Webbrain Academy tomonidan tayyorlangan HTML, CSS va JavaScript “Zero to Expert” darsliklarini barchaga qisman yoki to‘liq bepul ochib berish haqida o‘ylayapmiz.
Bir tomondan, darsliklar bepul bo‘lsa qadri yo‘qolishi mumkin.
Ikkinchi tomondan esa bepul taqdim etish orqali yuzlab yoshlar uchun bilim eshiklari ochiladi.
Siz nima deb o`ylaysiz? Darslikni bepulga o…
Dasturlashni o‘rganaman deb oylarni, yillarni o‘tkazib yubordingiz. Bugungi kun, bugungi imkoniyat qaytib kelmasligi mumkin.
🚀 Bu videolar ham, bu webinarlar ham sizga qayta qayta eslatilishi, Instagram telegramlarda ham sizni taqib qilishi tasodif deb o‘ylaysizmi?! Albatta yo‘q, chunki navbatdagi webinarda rad etib bo‘lmas takliflar tayyorlangan!
⏳ O‘ylanaverishdan foyda yo‘q, hamma o‘z harakatini qilmoqda, yana b…
Assalom alaykum!
Sizni ushbu sahifada ko‘rib turganimdan xursandman. Men Sardorbek Muhtorov, Webbrain Academy asoschisi va Digital One kompaniyasining co-founderi hisoblanaman.
Navbatdagi webinarda, dasturlash sohasidagi 3 ta og‘riqli nuqtalar haqida gaplashamiz:
🔹 IT’ni boshlay olmayotganlar.
🔹 IT’ni o‘rganishda qiynalayotganlar
🔹 Ish topa olmayotganlar.
Webinarda qatnashish mutlaq bepul. Siz uchun rad etib bo‘l…
AI sizni ishingizga daxl qila olmaydi, qachonki…
⬆️ Yuqoridagi postga namuna sifatida Yandex ilovasini ko’rsatishimiz mumkin
🚗 O’zbekiston bozoriga million dollardan ortiq mablag’ sarflab, investitsiya kiritib kelmoqda! Nega?
Shunday katta kompaniya rahbarlari axmoq emas-ki, AI ularga xavf solib turganida investitsiya kiritsa?!
✅ Bill Geyts aytganidek:
AI hech qachon dasturchilar o’rnini bosa olmaydi!
🚫 Shu payt…
AI va IT: Xavf yoki Imkoniyat?!
✅ Hozirgi zamonda sun’iy intellekt (AI) IT sohasiga ham tahdid, ham ulkan imkoniyatlar olib kelmoqda!
➡️ AI’ning rivojlanishi oddiy vazifalarni avtomatlashtirib, ba’zi kasblarni yo‘q qilish xavfini tug‘dirishi mumkin. Ammo bu xavf emas, aksincha, yangi ko‘nikmalarni o‘rganish va o‘zini yangilash uchun bir imkoniyatdir.
▶️ AI o‘zini o‘zi takomillashtiradi, ammo u doimo inson aqliga m…
🎰 Sizga AI haqida maqola tayyorlab qo’ydim
O’qishga tayyormisiz?
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @webbrain_academy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Yana o'sha qadirdon mavzu, ChatGPT dasturchilar ishini olib qo'yadimi?
Ha19%
Yo'q65%
Bilmadim16%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 November 2024 to 1 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 106,736 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WebBrain Academy” (@webbrain_academy), 714 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/webbrain_academy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
