📣Смотрите че нашла, брендбук месседжера Макс Можно скачать иконки в разных форматах 👏
🔥6
Signed Татьяна Цыбина ➹ SEO и сайты для бизнеса

Channel
@web_tsybina
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
628subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001205323160 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @web_tsybina |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 21 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/web_tsybina |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 628 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 629 | +8 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 621 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 622 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 11 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (11 May 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 155 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
157 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 80 | 51.0% | |
| 🔥 | 46 | 29.3% | |
| 👍 | 30 | 19.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.637% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @web_tsybina. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 May 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📣Смотрите че нашла, брендбук месседжера Макс Можно скачать иконки в разных форматах 👏
🔥6
Signed Татьяна Цыбина ➹ SEO и сайты для бизнеса
❓Поделитесь какой моделью пользуетесь и вообще практикуете вайбкод или нет? Для себя увидела плюсы, что можно сделать гибче визуал. Из минусов, довольно долго выпучивала, чтобы все работало как надо. Ещё остается открытым вопрос на сколько такой код утяжеляет сайт 🤷♀️
❤3
Signed Татьяна Цыбина ➹ SEO и сайты для бизнеса
Рассказала о новой мечте 💭💙🐋🛥️ #SEO #SEO_обучение #seo_ai #seo_кейсы
🔥10
Signed Татьяна Цыбина ➹ SEO и сайты для бизнеса
Нашла в тредс очень классный промпт. Делюсь с вами 🌸а вы делитесь результатами 🙂 получается прям милота Нарисуй это фото в стиле современной авторской наивной иллюстрации: минимализл hand-drawn, забавные пропорции, неровные контуры, плоские контрастные цвета, декоративные штрихи, без теней, без градиентов, без 3D, вид дорогого дизайнерского постера
❤8
Signed Татьяна Цыбина ➹ SEO и сайты для бизнеса
Душевный отзыв о курсе по SEO 😍
❤5
Signed Татьяна Цыбина ➹ SEO и сайты для бизнеса
🎤 Кейс: как продвинуть студию вокала в Москве Выйти в ТОП по запросу «студия вокала в Москве» задача крайне сложная. Особенно для лендинга. Совсем другая история нишевый запрос «студия вокала Плейлист у метро Новослободская». Это уже геозависимый запрос с понятным намерением пользователя. Тем более заказчик поступил абсолютно правильно: обратился к SEO-специалисту ещё на этапе подготовки текста. Это всегда эффект…
🔥11👍4❤🔥1
Signed Татьяна Цыбина ➹ SEO и сайты для бизнеса
Возможно моя история перехода на фриланс кому-то будет полезна 🍞 🖤Почитать в инсте
👍3🔥1
Signed Татьяна Цыбина ➹ SEO и сайты для бизнеса
Звонки без предупреждения и ноль брифа: кейс про красные флаги 🚩🚩🚩 Я так расслабилась на потоке рекомендаций, что реально успела забыть, как выглядят реальные красные флаги. Недавно прилетел запрос на SEO‑копирайтинг — думаю: очередной адекватный милашка. Спойлер: нет. Сигналы начались сразу 🔴 🛑Звонки без предупреждения, сходу вкидывание в групповой чат и часовые обсуждения «срочно и прямо сейчас». Спрашивать, уд…
❤39👍20🔥4
Signed Татьяна Цыбина ➹ SEO и сайты для бизнеса
Провели в пятницу эфир для ребят с курса по SEO на тему профикалтики выгорания и тревожности. Многие увидели увидели в ситуациях, которые привела пример @design_karma_web Спасибо, Дарина! Ты лучшая! Это было максимально полезно и вдохновляюще! Настолько, что даже в выходные я позволила себе отдохнуть! И мне и ребятам откликнулось на 100000% Полезный канал Дарины, агенство Карма веб ❤️
❤4
Signed Татьяна Цыбина ➹ SEO и сайты для бизнеса
На этой позитивной ноте я пошла пить кофе и играть в компуктер, хороших всем выходных🥰🔥❤️
Signed Татьяна Цыбина ➹ SEO и сайты для бизнеса
⭐️Стартовали с 9-м потоком курса по SEO. Этот поток получился уютный и камерный, всего 20 человек ☀️ Я почти не продавала курс: уехала в путешествие Москва — Крым — Москва, потом приехала на 2 недели в Омск, чтобы обновить программу и дозаписать новые уроки. И снова ✈️ в Сочи, но уже не в опуск, а по ответствееному делу. Следить и лечить котиков друга. Я редко провожу курс, это 2 раза в год. Поэтому, конечно, кур…
🔥8❤2
Signed Татьяна Цыбина ➹ SEO и сайты для бизнеса
Так грустно читать истории селлеров в ПВЗ. Работа в минус, уход с МП. Но из плюсов, развитие своих точек продаж, соц сетей и сайтов.
👍3
Signed Татьяна Цыбина ➹ SEO и сайты для бизнеса
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @web_tsybina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Таня Цыбина ➻ кудряво про SEO” (@web_tsybina), 628 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/web_tsybina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.