Channel
@web5e
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
47subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003287292865 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @web5e |
| Created | 28 October 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/web5e |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 22:41 | 47 | +3 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 20:59 | 44 | -2 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 01:42 | 46 | +6 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 02:22 | 40 | no change |
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 40 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 39 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 28 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
27 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 11 | 40.7% | |
| custom 5380084379538198971 | 8 | 29.6% | |
| custom 5208668768716231038 | 6 | 22.2% | |
| custom 5368382848514426426 | 2 | 7.41% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 28 October 2025 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всё ещё делаю эмодзи кстати, цена $1 за эмодзи Проекты с которыми я сотрудничал: @vpnusvpn_bot @AtlantaVPN_bot @VPNhub_robot Так же продаётся приват с полным обучением по созданию таких же эмодзи! Цена $10 за вход. Связь - @xromora
@stdecrx мои работы
custom 53800843795381989712
@revecron отзывы
Video, posted without a caption
custom 52086687687162310383custom 53800843795381989713
Моё био - ecronx.xyz Эмодзи бот - @onemoji_bot
Обновил бота!
В боте @ecronvertsbot было выпущено обновление. Теперь эмодзи и стикеры можно конвертировать не только в форматы .tgs и .json, но и в видео/фото форматы
custom 52086687687162310383custom 53683828485144264262custom 53800843795381989712
🐸 Сделал для вас двух ботов: @ecronvertsbot - конвертация премиум эмодзи в .json / json - tgs / tgs- json @emchelpbot - перекраска эмодзи
🤡11custom 53800843795381989711
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @web5e. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“chrome or a” (@web5e), 47 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/web5e.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.